I am so sick of these guys who lose to Jones claiming some kind of excuse. Machida and Jones was even in the first round and then jones submitted him in the second. End of story. No rematch. Maynard vs. Edgar was understandable in regards to a rematch, but cmon? Even Belfort might deserve a second chance. Not Machida. Are we led to believe that Machida has improved significantly to warrant a rematch. I just don't get it. Jones and Gustaffson is much more interesting. Hell, I'll take Hendricks or Condit moving to 205 over Machida. Please help me on this one.