Interesting article in regards to 'undeserved' title shots

MuayMuay

http://www.h4-entertainment.com/2013/03/undeserved-title-shots/

check out this article, do you agree?

Galvanik

That article was just whining and pandering to other whiners. I'm not saying undeserved title shots aren't a problem, but this article did nothing but complain and give snide remarks about the whole situation- no new ideas or information. Not a good read overall.

carnages41

wedo619

tldr [-X
read the first paragraph ,saw "twilight cast horny" and stopped

BruteDion

Repeat of old ideals which I do agree with though

But he discredits Weidmans wins over Maia and Munoz by using thier Current rankings and not thier "Time of fight Rankings" that's such a classic ploy to prove a weak point...both guys were top 10er at time of the fight with Munoz being a top 5er (I dont care what anyone says...just look at the damn rankings...munoz was top 5)....what other MW has that on thier current streak of wins?...no one but vitor i think...face it Weidman has earned a shot

And also he went on to justify Hendricks getting a title shot by saying he has 2 top 10 wins...while agree it should be his shot and not Diaz...I'm just pointing out how much of a hypocrite the writer was being

rodrodMMA92

Whenever a fighter loses an undeserved title shot they surpass can status and become juice boxes.

classicboxer

The same thing can happen in boxing, except for the way Sonnen got the title shot.