Jump to content
diazthechamp

Politics thread

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, I_Take_Roids_m8 said:

I was listening to rush today on my travels and he said something that cracked me up. He said that the media is saying that men and women have the same physical features and should he able to identify as whatever. He then followed it up by saying, "That's nuts". And then he paused for a second and changed the subject. 

 

 

Martina Navratilova got attacked so badly for saying exactly that. 

I will say though, I'm actually excited for the days when men (pretending to be women) take over womens sports. They will actually be watchable at that point. lol

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

weatched the Fox Town Hall w/ Sanders, pro Bern audience,  no way Biden could compete if he enters ... Bern toned it down a bit & did well

Bernie will be the Dem nom. hands down, Democratic Socialism lol -

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A LABOUR MP who likened hardcore Brexiters in the Tory Party to the Nazis has doubled down on the comparison – insisting it is not “strong enough”.

David Lammy said people across the UK are experiencing “rising hate and extremism” and argued it must be called out “for what it is”.

He made the comments after being asked about a previous comparison he made between the European Research Group (ERG) of Eurosceptic Tories and the Nazi Party and South African apartheid state.

 

Speaking at a rally last month, he told supporters of a second EU referendum that the ERG should not be "appeased", just as Winston Churchill did not appease Hitler.

Appearing on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show, it was put to him that this was unacceptable.

He replied: "Andrew, I would say that that wasn't strong enough. In 1938 there were allies who hatched a plan for Hitler to annex part of Czechoslovakia, and Churchill said no, and he stood alone.

"We must not appease. We're in a situation now, and let me just be clear, I'm an ethnic minority.

"We have, in the ERG, in Jacob Rees-Mogg, someone who is happy to put on to his web pages the horrible, racist AfD party, a party that's Islamophobic and on the far-right."

 

The man is a complete moron. 

9 hours ago, Bezerker101 said:

weatched the Fox Town Hall w/ Sanders, pro Bern audience,  no way Biden could compete if he enters ... Bern toned it down a bit & did well

Bernie will be the Dem nom. hands down, Democratic Socialism lol - 

Out of any of the Dem candidates so far i'd probably most like to see Bernie go up against Trump. Get the sense he would tare Warren & Biden apart.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Jolldan said:

A LABOUR MP who likened hardcore Brexiters in the Tory Party to the Nazis has doubled down on the comparison – insisting it is not “strong enough”.

David Lammy said people across the UK are experiencing “rising hate and extremism” and argued it must be called out “for what it is”.

He made the comments after being asked about a previous comparison he made between the European Research Group (ERG) of Eurosceptic Tories and the Nazi Party and South African apartheid state.

 

Speaking at a rally last month, he told supporters of a second EU referendum that the ERG should not be "appeased", just as Winston Churchill did not appease Hitler.

Appearing on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show, it was put to him that this was unacceptable.

He replied: "Andrew, I would say that that wasn't strong enough. In 1938 there were allies who hatched a plan for Hitler to annex part of Czechoslovakia, and Churchill said no, and he stood alone.

"We must not appease. We're in a situation now, and let me just be clear, I'm an ethnic minority.

"We have, in the ERG, in Jacob Rees-Mogg, someone who is happy to put on to his web pages the horrible, racist AfD party, a party that's Islamophobic and on the far-right."

 

The man is a complete moron. 

Out of any of the Dem candidates so far i'd probably most like to see Bernie go up against Trump. Get the sense he would tare Warren & Biden apart.

 

and Harris

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Bezerker101 said:

 

and Harris

All I had heard of her was she was a potential nomination honestly can't say I have ever even heard her talk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Jolldan said:

A LABOUR MP who likened hardcore Brexiters in the Tory Party to the Nazis has doubled down on the comparison – insisting it is not “strong enough”.

David Lammy said people across the UK are experiencing “rising hate and extremism” and argued it must be called out “for what it is”.

He made the comments after being asked about a previous comparison he made between the European Research Group (ERG) of Eurosceptic Tories and the Nazi Party and South African apartheid state.

 

Speaking at a rally last month, he told supporters of a second EU referendum that the ERG should not be "appeased", just as Winston Churchill did not appease Hitler.

Appearing on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show, it was put to him that this was unacceptable.

He replied: "Andrew, I would say that that wasn't strong enough. In 1938 there were allies who hatched a plan for Hitler to annex part of Czechoslovakia, and Churchill said no, and he stood alone.

"We must not appease. We're in a situation now, and let me just be clear, I'm an ethnic minority.

"We have, in the ERG, in Jacob Rees-Mogg, someone who is happy to put on to his web pages the horrible, racist AfD party, a party that's Islamophobic and on the far-right."

 

The man is a complete moron. 

Out of any of the Dem candidates so far i'd probably most like to see Bernie go up against Trump. Get the sense he would tare Warren & Biden apart.

Oh, Bernie would get ****ing PIED. His proposals are so far out there. All Trump would really have to do is refute Bernie's dip****tery on a debate stage. America is dumb, but they're not dumb enough to vote for astronomical tax hikes. Some of his proposals would demand more than some Americans even make in a year. lol

Edited by cashfl0w
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, cashfl0w said:

Oh, Bernie would get ****ing PIED. His proposals are so far out there. All Trump would really have to do is refute Bernie's dip****tery on a debate stage. America is dumb, but they're not dumb enough to vote for astronomical tax hikes. I think I heard his proposals as of now would demand $20,000 from even the lowest class. Some people don't make that in a year. lol

The left has gone so far off the rails, from the Green Deal to Bernie's madness to Swalwell's gun buy back...they've lost any chance of swinging moderates, or gaining ground.

Cut their own throats before it even started, Trump won't even clean his desk out...just in case lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not writing Bernie off. If he gets the nomination I think he stands a fair chance of winning the top spot. The problem America has is that no one has actually lived under a socialist Government so all that free stuff on offer sounds pretty appealing.

Add that to Bern's promise to make the nasty one percent pay for it all and I reckon he's got quite the potent message.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My favorite moment in politics this week was Nancy Pelosi saying she could get a glass of water elected in AOC's district if the glass of water had a "D" beside it.

I love how she can just openly call people sheep. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, cashfl0w said:

My favorite moment in politics this week was Nancy Pelosi saying she could get a glass of water elected in AOC's district if the glass of water had a "D" beside it.

I love how she can just openly call people sheep. 

I can't stand either of them but the arguing between the two of them is pretty funny. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, cashfl0w said:

My favorite moment in politics this week was Nancy Pelosi saying she could get a glass of water elected in AOC's district if the glass of water had a "D" beside it.

I love how she can just openly call people sheep. 

we all know Joe Crowley was the biggest threat to replace Pelosi, .. hence ... AOC pulls off the miraculous upset - coincidence ? lol

 

the top Republican Senators are demanding the Clinton investigation be re-opened, now that the Mueller probe is over,

.... lead by the big dog > Lindsey Graham

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bezerker101 said:

we all know Joe Crowley was the biggest threat to replace Pelosi, .. hence ... AOC pulls off the miraculous upset - coincidence ? lol

 

the top Republican Senators are demanding the Clinton investigation be re-opened, now that the Mueller probe is over,

.... lead by the big dog > Lindsey Graham

Waste of money

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Bezerker101 said:

Dems freaking-out over Sanders momentum, already plotting take-down coup -

I still can't figure out why anyone is taking him seriously. 

Am I the only one that remembers the DNC gave Bernie the shaft in the very last election?? Why is he suddenly going to get a fair shake now? The answer is: He won't. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking of Bernie, I was listening to Rush and he played a soundbite of home at some rally and being questioned by some broad about how he plans to pay for all of this chit he wants to hand out for "free" and he was reluctant to answer and then quietly he mumbled "taxes". Dead silence. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, I_Take_Roids_m8 said:

Speaking of Bernie, I was listening to Rush and he played a soundbite of home at some rally and being questioned by some broad about how he plans to pay for all of this chit he wants to hand out for "free" and he was reluctant to answer and then quietly he mumbled "taxes". Dead silence. 

Well, at least he isnt lying like the rest. He will never be able to do what he wants, but hes upfront about what he wants to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rosenstein frozen with fear in the background.

Looking like he went and flipped on the cabal. Should we start a pool about how long it takes him to "commit suicide"? I'll go with four months.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its interesting to see some of it.

 

Don jr and Jared not getting charged because they probably didnt know what they were doing was illegal.

Pretty much a similar reason for Hillary not being charged. She didnt know.

 

But you yet the actress who paid for her kids cheating, and her defence is she knew what she was doing was breaking a few rules, but not illegal as **** for the charges they want on her. But they'll end up trying to throw the book at her

 

Money buys a lack of justice and political ties buys even more.

 

My next speeding ticket I'm going to try and say I didnt know any better so they should let me go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kushner and Junior did not break a law. Intent or not.

Hillary did break the law, because intent is not factored into that crime. Also, lol @ her not knowing that Bleachbitting and hammering the hard drive to pieces after being subpoenaed would be a crime. I'm pretty sure everyone on the planet is aware that's a crime, especially a lifelong lawyer.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, MoZZez said:

Well, at least he isnt lying like the rest. He will never be able to do what he wants, but hes upfront about what he wants to do.

What he wants to do is spend a **** load more money. Throwing money at every problem isn't sustainable. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/16/2019 at 9:52 PM, Bezerker101 said:

if it comes down to Obama's so-called legacy being trashed, or  Clinton being prosecuted,

.... Clintons' goin' down -

Nope, they will waste millions if they pursue it and then say they can't prove anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, juice64011 said:

What he wants to do is spend a **** load more money. Throwing money at every problem isn't sustainable. 

Oh I'm not claiming it is.

I'm just saying that every other politician will lie about it to your face. He is just telling you how he plans to bend you over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Bezerker101 said:

the Democratic claims of "collusion & obstruction" failed to meet civil standards (civil suit or judgement) also .....

My favorite tinfoil hat conspiracy of the day was that the Russians were watching his campaign rally when he joked about them coming up with the emails (she had already destroyed), and they attempted to hack the DNC server that night because of what he said.

CRINGE. You lost, get over it.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Mueller report redacted is a very damning document, this isn't ground breaking precedent in the coming months...it's history we've already seen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Bezerker101 said:

the report basically says, Mueller knew 18 months ago that there was no collusion ....

lol...That's irrelevant, have you read the 448 page document ? Just go straight to Volume 2, and munch on those 185 pages.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The report was never about Trump, it's about Russia...start reading instead of vomiting Fox news, you're embarrassing yourself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Bwana said:

The report was never about Trump, it's about Russia...start reading instead of vomiting Fox news, you're embarrassing yourself.

 

Ironic lol, vol 1 is about Trump collusion w/ Russia, Vol 2 is about Trump obstruction, ... the worst thing being

him asking McGahn about "Mueller's conflict of interest " .. McGahn pushed back and nothing happened ....

 

 

Pelosi &  Hoyer both said > let's move on/ Schiff and Nadler are still looking at impeachment which is a beyond dead issue

considering it requires a supermajority

 

this "Mueller report" episode goes the way of Omarosa now or after Mueller testifies ... if he testifies -

I've read the report twice since yesterday, so I'm loaded for bear .... bring it dem -

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Bwana said:

lol...That's irrelevant, have you read the 448 page document ? Just go straight to Volume 2, and munch on those 185 pages.

You cannot obstruct justice as the president, AND you cannot obstruct justice into a crime you didn't commit. lol

There's not a damn thing to see in there. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×