Jump to content
diazthechamp

Politics thread

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, -idyb- said:

The Trumpster on the shootings in Dayton: “May God bless the memory of those who perished in Toledo; may God protect them. May God protect all of those from Texas to Ohio. May God bless the victims and their families.”

 

not sure if he's trolling, geographically inept, or predicting a future shooting in toledo ohio

Him and Melania posed with a baby who lost both parents, Trump.was giving the thumbs up.

 

So I would say he is just an idiot with bad handlers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, cashfl0w said:

I will be piling very high on Trump if those odds maintain. I just don't see anybody electable on the left. Buncha goofs.

 

I put a big number on Trump back 7/17 to win re-election and I have a personal bet on the Clintons' to get indicted before 2021,

 ... there's a dude here that bet Hillary -  2K with a Chicago fireman - 6'6"/ 350 then left town rather than square - liberals  🙃

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, VertFTW said:

With posters I only get triggerd if the gun posted is a assault rifle AND its ugly. ITR has a few lol

this-is-a-ruger-mini-14-semi-automatic-u

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sobercuban said:

Yeah man, if they nominate Kamala Harris or some dumb **** Trump is going to win just based on low democratic turnout.  Republic turnout will be ENORMOUS this time.

There are more Dems that GOP members, fire the brown & black people up to call off work to vote...and socialism is right around the corner. A big turn out won't be good for Trump, just look at the past primaries.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. You don’t need an assault rifle to protect your house. A pistol would do the job just fine. 

2. The odds of you ever facing an intruder are minuscule.

3. You don’t need to go round up all the assault rifles, you make it a felony to possess one and most law abiding citizens will turn them in on their own. Sure, some people will keep them and never be caught, but they aren’t the ones we’re worried about. When someone commits a crime with one you slap a couple additional charges on them and the number of assault rifles on the street will whittle down thru attrition.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, 12еr said:

1. You don’t need an assault rifle to protect your house. A pistol would do the job just fine. 

2. The odds of you ever facing an intruder are minuscule.

3. You don’t need to go round up all the assault rifles, you make it a felony to possess one and most law abiding citizens will turn them in on their own. Sure, some people will keep them and never be caught, but they aren’t the ones we’re worried about. When someone commits a crime with one you slap a couple additional charges on them and the number of assault rifles on the street will whittle down thru attrition.

This would radicalize tens of thousands of people.

Thousands more would eventually get a felony charge for owning a gun that they may have legally owned without any issues for decades. 

Meanwhile the crazies will just choose a different weapon or make bombs and continue to kill people.

All of this because the media creates mass hysteria over one of the least common weapons that is used to murder people. 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, juice64011 said:

This would radicalize tens of thousands of people.

Thousands more would eventually get a felony charge for owning a gun that they may have legally owned without any issues for decades. 

Meanwhile the crazies will just choose a different weapon or make bombs and continue to kill people.

All of this because the media creates mass hysteria over one of the least common weapons that is used to murder people. 

 

3pc-d07-320w.jpeg

20311645018_lrg_1_@1x.jpg

giphy.gif

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, juice64011 said:

This would radicalize tens of thousands of people.

Thousands more would eventually get a felony charge for owning a gun that they may have legally owned without any issues for decades. 

Meanwhile the crazies will just choose a different weapon or make bombs and continue to kill people.

All of this because the media creates mass hysteria over one of the least common weapons that is used to murder people. 

 

This is borderline hysterical. There was an assault weapons ban during the 90’s and somehow people survived. 

And if republicans actually believed that the fix for the issue was one of mental health, then why the **** don’t they do anything about it.

What is infuriating is that this **** keeps happening and we see the same people spout the same horse chit talking points and then do nothing.

People are fed up with the current policy, which is to do absolutely ****ing nothing. This is why the Republican Party is going extinct in the suburbs. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And stop pointing out that crazies will use something else. No chit, the point is to deny them easy access to more efficient weapons for committing a mass murder.

The Iranians should just tell Trump to stop worrying about them getting nukes since they already have other types of bombs.

Hydrogen bomb or tnt, what’s the difference guys, amirite.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, 12еr said:

This is borderline hysterical. There was an assault weapons ban during the 90’s and somehow people survived. 

And if republicans actually believed that the fix for the issue was one of mental health, then why the **** don’t they do anything about it.

What is infuriating is that this **** keeps happening and we see the same people spout the same horse chit talking points and then do nothing.

People are fed up with the current policy, which is to do absolutely ****ing nothing. This is why the Republican Party is going extinct in the suburbs. 

There was a ban on people buying more AR's. They never threatened to make people felons if they didn't turn their property into the government. Huge difference. 

I think your plan would cause more violence instead of preventing it. 

The guns are here, they aren't going anywhere so our govt needs to come up with a better solution. If you ban selling them, then you have 100 years before they aren't readily available. Compare the technology 100 years ago to now and by the time you can't find them they would be obsolete anyway. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, 12еr said:

And stop pointing out that crazies will use something else. No chit, the point is to deny them easy access to more efficient weapons for committing a mass murder.

The Iranians should just tell Trump to stop worrying about them getting nukes since they already have other types of bombs.

Hydrogen bomb or tnt, what’s the difference guys, amirite.

Great job comparing a gun used to kill maybe a couple of hundred people a year in the US to a nuke.

In the real world hand guns are used to kill 7000+ people a year while ARs are used to kill maybe 150-200 on average. 

Not only are hand guns used to kill way more people but they are also used in the majority of mass murders that you want to prevent. 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, juice64011 said:

Great job comparing a gun used to kill maybe a couple of hundred people a year in the US to a nuke.

In the real world hand guns are used to kill 7000+ people a year while ARs are used to kill maybe 150-200 on average

Not only are hand guns used to kill way more people but they are also used in the majority of mass murders that you want to prevent. 

 

 

 

They're not trying to address the real problem, just the mythical lightning strike the media has stuck in their heads.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, juice64011 said:

There was a ban on people buying more AR's. They never threatened to make people felons if they didn't turn their property into the government. Huge difference. 

 

And in the 90’s Columbine was shocking. Modern problems require modern solutions.

That said, I’m not even endorsing this solution, but I’m merely pointing out that the arguments that it’s impossible to reign in the number of any particular weapon is a lazy write off with no basis in reality.

If the right wants to avoid these drastic measures then they need to start coming up with actual solutions because the constant stonewalling is getting old.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, juice64011 said:

Great job comparing a gun used to kill maybe a couple of hundred people a year in the US to a nuke.

In the real world hand guns are used to kill 7000+ people a year while ARs are used to kill maybe 150-200 on average. 

Not only are hand guns used to kill way more people but they are also used in the majority of mass murders that you want to prevent. 

 

 

 

Handguns are used more often to kill people because of the sheer number of handguns in the country outweighing the number of assault rifles by 1000 fold. You could go look at England's crime statistics and argue a knife is more dangerous than an AK-47 based on the number of knife deaths versus gun deaths. Numbers are meaningless without context.

If you remove gang violence and murders committed in the commission of another crime, then the number of mass shootings committed with handguns would be negligible. The mass murders where random people are being gunned down by random psycho's is almost always committed with an assault rifle.  We're not having the same debate over and over again because crazies are walking into schools and killing children with a 44 magnum. 

Assault rifles are more efficient killing machines, and that's why the military uses them. If pistols were equally capable, then that's what would be used in war and the fox news crowd who live in fear every day of their lives wouldn't be ****ting their pants at the prospect of losing them.

And lastly, the nuke statement was an apt comparison. If it sounded absurd, that's because it was intended to. That's what the whole "there's no point in trying to stop it because criminals will be criminals anyway" sounds like to anyone who doesn't agree with your position already.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Bezerker101 said:

 

I put a big number on Trump back 7/17 to win re-election and I have a personal bet on the Clintons' to get indicted before 2021,

 ... there's a dude here that bet Hillary -  2K with a Chicago fireman - 6'6"/ 350 then left town rather than square - liberals  🙃

He should have filed for bankruptcy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, 12еr said:

Handguns are used more often to kill people because of the sheer number of handguns in the country outweighing the number of assault rifles by 1000 fold. You could go look at England's crime statistics and argue a knife is more dangerous than an AK-47 based on the number of knife deaths versus gun deaths. Numbers are meaningless without context.

If you remove gang violence and murders committed in the commission of another crime, then the number of mass shootings committed with handguns would be negligible. The mass murders where random people are being gunned down by random psycho's is almost always committed with an assault rifle.  We're not having the same debate over and over again because crazies are walking into schools and killing children with a 44 magnum. 

Assault rifles are more efficient killing machines, and that's why the military uses them. If pistols were equally capable, then that's what would be used in war and the fox news crowd who live in fear every day of their lives wouldn't be ****ting their pants at the prospect of losing them.

And lastly, the nuke statement was an apt comparison. If it sounded absurd, that's because it was intended to. That's what the whole "there's no point in trying to stop it because criminals will be criminals anyway" sounds like to anyone who doesn't agree with your position already.

Pretty sure the folks acting afraid for their lives aren't on Fox News...

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, juice64011 said:

Meanwhile the crazies will just choose a different weapon or make bombs and continue to kill people.

We have discussed this already...its alot harder to make a good bomb.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BBC Breaking News (@BBCBreaking) twitteó a las 8:13 a. m. on sáb., ago. 10, 2019:
US financier Jeffrey Epstein found dead in his cell while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges, US media report https://t.co/lfXOylpyPB
(https://twitter.com/BBCBreaking/status/1160177267693314048?s=09)

 

 

lol he knew too much about the real big fish(aka bill)...he had to be Killed. 

Edited by VertFTW
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, VertFTW said:

BBC Breaking News (@BBCBreaking) twitteó a las 8:13 a. m. on sáb., ago. 10, 2019:
US financier Jeffrey Epstein found dead in his cell while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges, US media report https://t.co/lfXOylpyPB
(https://twitter.com/BBCBreaking/status/1160177267693314048?s=09)

 

 

lol he knew too much about the real big fish(aka bill)...he had to be Killed. 

Surprise

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last night Epstein threw a member of the Clinton cabinet under the bus...this morning he died from "suicide" via hanging while on suicide watch.

"It is unclear how Epstein could have killed himself since he was under suicide watch" - from news article haha

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, 12еr said:

Handguns are used more often to kill people because of the sheer number of handguns in the country outweighing the number of assault rifles by 1000 fold. You could go look at England's crime statistics and argue a knife is more dangerous than an AK-47 based on the number of knife deaths versus gun deaths. Numbers are meaningless without context.

If you remove gang violence and murders committed in the commission of another crime, then the number of mass shootings committed with handguns would be negligible. The mass murders where random people are being gunned down by random psycho's is almost always committed with an assault rifle.  We're not having the same debate over and over again because crazies are walking into schools and killing children with a 44 magnum. 

Assault rifles are more efficient killing machines, and that's why the military uses them. If pistols were equally capable, then that's what would be used in war and the fox news crowd who live in fear every day of their lives wouldn't be ****ting their pants at the prospect of losing them.

And lastly, the nuke statement was an apt comparison. If it sounded absurd, that's because it was intended to. That's what the whole "there's no point in trying to stop it because criminals will be criminals anyway" sounds like to anyone who doesn't agree with your position already.

Post a source. What I have found says that your statement is completely false within the last 30+ years. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, 12еr said:

Handguns are used more often to kill people because of the sheer number of handguns in the country outweighing the number of assault rifles by 1000 fold. You could go look at England's crime statistics and argue a knife is more dangerous than an AK-47 based on the number of knife deaths versus gun deaths. Numbers are meaningless without context.

If you remove gang violence and murders committed in the commission of another crime, then the number of mass shootings committed with handguns would be negligible. The mass murders where random people are being gunned down by random psycho's is almost always committed with an assault rifle.  We're not having the same debate over and over again because crazies are walking into schools and killing children with a 44 magnum. 

Assault rifles are more efficient killing machines, and that's why the military uses them. If pistols were equally capable, then that's what would be used in war and the fox news crowd who live in fear every day of their lives wouldn't be ****ting their pants at the prospect of losing them.

And lastly, the nuke statement was an apt comparison. If it sounded absurd, that's because it was intended to. That's what the whole "there's no point in trying to stop it because criminals will be criminals anyway" sounds like to anyone who doesn't agree with your position already.

 

Only 1% of all gun "deaths" a year are caused by AR'S (and other style of rifles)

 

I don't know what sources you have were handguns outweighs AR's but all of my friends have rifles, sometimes numerous ones. I dont think I know a person in my area that doesnt have an AR/AK. 

 

Anyone I have ever talked with or forums I've been on keep an AR/AK by the bed, especially if they live away from cities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, VertFTW said:

Lol @MoZZez you got destroyed here.

 

This suicide reminds me of Frank pantangeli in the godfather ll what a goat clip

 

So the pedo killed himself and somehow I got destroyed?

 

You really are an idiot vert, I'm more than happy to say that's one less sick **** on the earth. You know, I never said, hinted or even thought this guy was ever innocent, especially seeing his previous charges.

 

For a top 20 education, you have the reading comprehension of some kindergarten child.

 

But do carry on, watching retards go on and on does entertain me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, 12еr said:

1. You don’t need an assault rifle to protect your house. A pistol would do the job just fine. 

2. The odds of you ever facing an intruder are minuscule.

3. You don’t need to go round up all the assault rifles, you make it a felony to possess one and most law abiding citizens will turn them in on their own. Sure, some people will keep them and never be caught, but they aren’t the ones we’re worried about. When someone commits a crime with one you slap a couple additional charges on them and the number of assault rifles on the street will whittle down thru attrition.

Take your hand and kindly slap yourself right in the ****ing face.

Please? For all of our sake's.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, SVTContour98 said:

Last night Epstein threw a member of the Clinton cabinet under the bus...this morning he died from "suicide" via hanging while on suicide watch.

"It is unclear how Epstein could have killed himself since he was under suicide watch" - from news article haha

 

Would take a true down syndrome victim to not realize we just witnessed yet another added to the Clinton body count.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Michael Coudrey (@MichaelCoudrey) twitteó a las 9:42 a. m. on sáb., ago. 10, 2019:
BREAKING: Alleged "camera malfunction" last night at MCC where Jeffrey Epstein was locked up.

#EpsteinFiles
(https://twitter.com/MichaelCoudrey/status/1160199691373621250?s=09)

 

🤯

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Weidman_The_God said:

Would take a true down syndrome victim to not realize we just witnessed yet another added to the Clinton body count.

Only @MoZZez  lol 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, 12еr said:

1. You don’t need an assault rifle to protect your house. A pistol would do the job just fine. 

2. The odds of you ever facing an intruder are minuscule.

3. You don’t need to go round up all the assault rifles, you make it a felony to possess one and most law abiding citizens will turn them in on their own. Sure, some people will keep them and never be caught, but they aren’t the ones we’re worried about. When someone commits a crime with one you slap a couple additional charges on them and the number of assault rifles on the street will whittle down thru attrition.

 

Like people turned in bump stocks? LMFAO

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, VertFTW said:

Michael Coudrey (@MichaelCoudrey) twitteó a las 9:42 a. m. on sáb., ago. 10, 2019:
BREAKING: Alleged "camera malfunction" last night at MCC where Jeffrey Epstein was locked up.

#EpsteinFiles
(https://twitter.com/MichaelCoudrey/status/1160199691373621250?s=09)

 

🤯

They can't make this much more obvious

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, 12еr said:

1. You don’t need an assault rifle to protect your house. A pistol would do the job just fine. 

 

 

mother of mercy...that's bad bro...seriously

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) twitteó a las 10:06 a. m. on sáb., ago. 10, 2019:
Under the Metropolitan Correctional Center's own rules, prisoners on suicide watch are to be kept under "direct, continuous observation." #Epstein https://t.co/H4GnMunuU4
(https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/1160205910867922944?s=09)

 

lol

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Breaking News:  Govt labels anyone who believes Epstein was murdered, instead of having committed suicide, as a conspiracy theorists and therefore ineligible to own Guns.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, VertFTW said:

We have discussed this already...its alot harder to make a good bomb.....

We have and I already explained how easy it is.

A couple of hundred pounds tannerite that can be bought at any sporting goods store 

1 vehicle

1 handgun

giphy.gif

giphy.gif

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, juice64011 said:

We have and I already explained how easy it is.

A couple of hundred pounds tannerite that can be bought at any sporting goods store 

1 vehicle

1 handgun

giphy.gif

 

Millenials wont bother....you should know better. Other than Jihadists and select people training in the military who was the last really good rougue bomb maker in the US? Take a guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Weidman_The_God said:

He's seriously a revisionist?

Nah, vert is just a ****ty story teller. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, VertFTW said:

Millenials wont bother....you should know better. Other than Jihadists and select people training in the military who was the last really good rougue bomb maker in the US? Take a guess.

Bomb maker?

Good God you are stupid.

You dont need to be a bomb maker to blow up some tannerite. 

 

All someone needs is an IQ higher than yours apparently. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Bwana said:

There are more Dems that GOP members, fire the brown & black people up to call off work to vote...and socialism is right around the corner. A big turn out won't be good for Trump, just look at the past primaries.

True ..... dems keep being crazy tho, that COULD cost them, when the silent majority of regular liberals hit the polls.  I'm still registered Dem so I'm going to vote in the primaries

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, juice64011 said:

A couple of hundred pounds tannerite that can be bought at any sporting goods store 

My buddy has some tannerite in his garage.  He threw me a jar or something full of it and made me think that it was going to blow up if I didn't catch it right, lol.   Bastard.

How much does it run?

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, sobercuban said:

My buddy has some tannerite in his garage.  He threw me a jar or something full of it and made me think that it was going to blow up if I didn't catch it right, lol.   Bastard.

How much does it run?

About $4 per pound of bought in bulk

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, juice64011 said:

About $4 per pound of bought in bulk

How much to do a gender reveal? 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×