Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
chons

Rare Example Of Species Evolving "Backwards" Observed

Recommended Posts

http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/evolution-went-backwards-in-one-population-of-common-lizards/

 

extra_large-1512570862-cover-image.jpg

IN GENERAL, THE COMMON LIZARD GIVES BIRTH TO LIVE YOUNG, EXCEPT IN TWO POPULATIONS. ABI WARNER/SHUTTERSTOCK

 
 

Despite what many of us were once taught in school, not all reptiles lay eggs. In fact, one of the most widespread lizards in Europe give birth to live young. Now, it seems these common lizards (Zootoca vivipara) have done something once thought impossible – they have in effect "reversed" evolution to re-evolve egg laying.

It's already been observed that two separate sub-populations of the common lizard still lay eggs (despite their name meaning live-bearing in both Latin and Greek). With one found along the border of France and Spain and the other in the Alps, it was assumed that they simply represented relic populations of the egg-laying ancestors of the common lizard.

To test this, researchers carried out genetic analysis of over 70 lizards collected throughout their range in Europe, in order to flesh out a detailed evolutionary tree. Their results are published on bioRxiv

It turns out that the tree is a little more complicated than they originally thought. The population of egg-laying lizards still knocking about in the Alps did indeed turn out to be a remnant group of the original egg-laying reptiles. But the lizards laying eggs in Spain were found to have re-evolved this ability, meaning that evolution basically went backwards.

This is interesting since in 1893, Belgian palaeontologist Louis Dollo presented a principle that in effect said that evolution is unidirectional, and so once an organism looses a complex trait (such as egg laying), it is not able to re-evolve it, even if it was to once again find itself living in the same environment. This is known as Dollo’s law, however the new analysis of the common lizard adds to mounting evidence that this is not strictly true.

Not only that, but evolutionarily speaking, the common lizard only evolved giving birth to live young relatively recently, within the last 2 million years or so. This means that the small renegade bunch in Spain must have regained egg laying even more recently, suggesting that perhaps they somehow retained the ability and that it was simply dormant within their DNA, before then being switched back on again.

This is not the first time that reptiles, or even lizards for that matter, have re-evolved egg laying. One such example is that of the Erycinae snakes – while most of these species are ovoviparous, at least three are known to lay eggs. It is thought that these three species likely re-evolved the ability after 60 million years, implying that they genuinely lost the genetic code for it, unlike the common lizards. Yet evolution still somehow managed to go backwards.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

evolving backwards? wouldn't it just be 'devolving'? 

Like I said, it's pretty crappy reporting. There really isn't any devolving or backward evolution going on. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like I said, it's pretty crappy reporting. There really isn't any devolving or backward evolution going on. 

Exactly.  Evolution is a forward moving process by definition.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dude you're still rocking a mullet... dafaq you talking about? Lol

 

 

i shaved my head bald on 4/20 and i still dont have that much hair.   but i never had a mullet, i just used to have long hair.   theres a difference between that. people with mullets dont have hair in the front.  at least not hair that can reach down past their chin i would imagine. i had a heavy metal head of hair homie. and maybe one day ill even grow it back!

 

what do you look like? im sure you dont have the balls to ever post any pictures here. you cant even take a silly forum bet for fun without welching. its okay,  im sure that you look like just as much of the joke you are on here.  probably some 16 year old with a justin bieber tattoo on his forehead. no wonder youre such a goof and living under mommy and daddys schedule.

Edited by -idyb-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TLDR

 

and i dont care.  shouldnt have you have thrown me on your ignore list weeks ago kiddo?

 

youre a f*cking clown dude. you sit under mom and dads roof and try to make fun of people or tell them how they should be living their lives. youre an insecure egotistical piece of chit.  now i see why the whole forum bags on you. you have no spine.  go back to playing call of duty and making dumb little youtube videos for your 1 subscriber before mom calls you upstairs for dinner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×