the problem with the "it was not an inside job" thing is that the story they have come up with, even if you believe their pseudoscience is that UBL, a known ISI operative, and everybody knows the ISI was created by the CIA to funnel money to Afghani /soviet resistors, sai himself that he didn't do it. He denied it. The taliban government told the American government that they'd gladly hand UBL over if they produced any proof at all that he did it. terrorists always take credit for their crap. why didn't bin laden? He pointed to the american governement saying it was an inside job. then he died in december of '01 and they made fake videos of people that bare no resemblance to bin laden at all, claiming to have done the deed.
there was a secretary within the CIA, that has since been gagged, that made a claim (as she was apparently in payroll) that UBL was on CIA payroll (even as the america's most wanted before 9/11) up to September 11, 2001.
Why would a CIA operative with family connections to the president plan 9/11 and then deny it for 3 months?
actually, up until recently, as they've faked his death, UBL was not wanted for 9/11. If you looked him up on the database of america's most wanted it said he was wanted for the USS Cole attack, not 9/11. If the Americans did actually kill him here a few months back (which is hard to do to somebody that had been dead for 9 years) it was only because they couldn't take him alive. they had no case if they took him to court. what evidence would they show? the fat bigger nosed guy that played him in the video that any retard can tell you isn't UBL. Or maybe they could show their subsequent taped messages and pretend they have voice analysis.