Jump to content

AUSMMA

Free
  • Content Count

    3,346
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Everything posted by AUSMMA

  1. Hey Mang On another note, how the **** do you have 34,000 posts!?
  2. I miss @AUSMMA‌, I wonder where he went
  3. Hendricks face was busted up...... I know...
  4. And tell me who won the fight p.s. I think Hendricks won, but if Johny can use it as an excuse, it can be used against him
  5. AUSMMA

    Hendricks won

    Round 2- Clearly JohnnyRound 3- Clearly GSP Round 4- Clearly Johnny Round 5- Close, but GSP took it The only contentious round is round 1 (I thought Hendricks won it, but I'll reserve my opinion until I watch it again). Fact is, MMA is scored on a round by round basis, so regardless of what happened the round before, each new round is back to square zero, and by these rules, you can understand how GSP won if the judges give him round 1. It was a close fight but, and my intial reaction was that Johnny was up 2-0 after the first 2, but I'll watch it again to make sure. However people saying it was the biggest robbery in UFC history are idiots, it was one round that determined the fight Pretty much EXACTLY how I see it. It all comes down to Round 1, which was close. Anyone denying that on either side is biased & rustled. Dana White, UFC fighters, and the majority of GSP fans on this forum believe that GSP lost. Effectively, if somebody acknowledges reality, they are biased. The fight was not close. That's why there is an uproar. I've learnt to completely disregard Dana White's opinion. He's an emotional retard
  6. I honestly thought Hendricks won 4 rounds No hate I disagree. Not trolling or being a jerk, I just wholeheartedly disagree
  7. AUSMMA

    Hendricks won

    Round 2- Clearly Johnny Round 3- Clearly GSP Round 4- Clearly Johnny Round 5- Close, but GSP took it The only contentious round is round 1 (I thought Hendricks won it, but I'll reserve my opinion until I watch it again). Fact is, MMA is scored on a round by round basis, so regardless of what happened the round before, each new round is back to square zero, and by these rules, you can understand how GSP won if the judges give him round 1. It was a close fight but, and my intial reaction was that Johnny was up 2-0 after the first 2, but I'll watch it again to make sure. However people saying it was the biggest robbery in UFC history are idiots, it was one round that determined the fight
  8. GSP is the reason I started watching this sport, and training, but my initial reaction was that Hendricks won. In my mind, Hendricks clearly won 2 and 4, and GSP won 3 and 5. Round 1 when I was watching the fight, I remember thinking Hendricks had won it, but looking at the stats, i can see why the judges gave it to GSP, although it was a RAZOR close round. Unfortunately, MMA fans need to realise that fights are based on a round by round basis. In the end, it doesn't matter if one fighter beat up the other the round before, as soon as a new round starts, its back to square zero. Whether you agree with this judging or not, GSP did enough to definitely win 2/5 rounds, and round 1 was so close, that its not a major robbery like everyone is making it out to be Essentially, most people need to be annoyed at round 1, because that was the defining round of the fight, the others were pretty clear cut to me
  9. Fredricks won by a very slim margin. But that's not how you win a championship. If you want to be the champ, you got to beat the champ. You don't take away the belt from a champion who held it for 6 years only because the other guy landed a couple of punches more and the champ's delicate skin bruises easily. thats what the dude said who i was discussing the fight with.. And GSP beaten like crap with the other dude looking like he just got out of his bath all fresh and smiling is not enough? People... Just go watch the tiny crap figures the UFC puts in front of your face since it corroborate people's bias (they need validation after all). Real fighters know. (so is GSP's face) It doesn't matter what a persons face looks like. If someone beats the **** out of someone in the first round, cuts them open, breaks their nose, but then gets outwrestled for 4 rounds, does that mean they won? Not according to MMA judging, its how you go in each individual round, and whether you can win a majority of them
  10. I personally am a huge GSP fan, but immediately after the fight felt Hendricks had won. However, the way MMA judging is set up, as soon as a new round starts, the previous is obsolete. Johnny may have beaten up GSP in round 2, but as soon as round 3 started, scores are reset at zero. So if you look at it from a round by round basis Round 1- Very close, first viewing I thought Hendricks, but looking at the stats, it was very even strike wise, and both got a TD each, although GSP threatened with a choke. Closest round of the fight (proven by the fact it decided the fight) Round 2- Clearly Johnny Round 3- GSP Round 4- Johnny Round 5- Close, but GSP takes this, no doubt You essentially have to look at an MMA fight like 5 mini-fights. When you do it like this, its easier to see why GSP got the win. Regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the rules, its a round by round basis, regardless of what happened in the previous round I'm going to go back and re-watch the fight, because first viewing I thought Johnny won, but after seeing so many discussions, maybe it isn't the case. Round 1 is the big one though Here is how Joe Lauzon scored the fight, which actually makes it a lot easier to understand the justification for George's win http://i.imgur.com/Pct2NQZ.png
  11. I don't know you. Who are you? Zaksame alt... Hello! Ahhh, I remember you. Why the alt account?
  12. I don't know you. Who are you?
  13. Sup kid So is Hector Lombard still an Aussie? Not until he starts winning again
  14. thread is going places :> Everything I touch turns to gold
  15. GTFO Words hurt you know
  16. You can never have too much
  17. Yes I knew you couldn't live without me
  18. Rampage looks like he doesn't even want to be there
  19. One has to ask, why did we need to change? I mean, what was wrong with the old forum (the much better forum in my opinion) ****
  20. Soooo, basically this is just Reddit, but crapper?
  21. Balls, I'll stop swearing than shall I? But don't you think the abuse button will get...abused (for lack of a better word)?
  22. This new layout is so hodgepodge. It's like they went to every website they could find, and grabbed one feature and put it on here. The only good thing is no swear filter, and the fact it tells you if there are new comments (pretty much just what Reddit does)
  23. Cursing excessively and at people. No reason for it Yeah, but what does it do? Like if I get 10 of them, do I get banned?
×
×
  • Create New...