King_Can Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 the **** dana? no link, it was litterally said 2 seconds ago at the presser. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SolidStateLogic Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 I would have Jon Jones above GSP as well in the P4P list... GSP sits at 4 right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carnages Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 He is if you know what pound for pound is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
top36 Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 2 or 3 is realistic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UFCDynasty Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 lmao 3 of us posted the same topic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwGSP Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 He is if you know what pound for pound is If you knew what it was, you wouldn't be trying to apply it to MMA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carnages Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 If you knew what it was' date=' you wouldn't be trying to apply it to MMA.[/quote'] lol a GSP fan would say that because they know GSP will never be #1 pound for pound Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King_Can Posted October 9, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 lol a GSP fan would say that because they know GSP will never be #1 pound for pound he already was twice, after Silva vs sonnen and silva vs maia.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carnages Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 he already was twice' date=' after Silva vs sonnen and silva vs maia....[/quote'] lawd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwGSP Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 lol a GSP fan would say that because they know GSP will never be #1 pound for pound And? There is no criteria for P4P, I could care less who is ranked where. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruteDion Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 Nope silva and gsp are above frankie....stack up what they have done and both beat frankie....i got him at 3 though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
classicboxer Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 If you knew what it was' date=' you wouldn't be trying to apply it to MMA.[/quote'] It's not complicated, and you can apply it to any sport with weight divisions. "If you knew what it was" lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carnages Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 And? There is no criteria for P4P' date=' I could care less who is ranked where.[/quote'] then why are you in this thread :confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwGSP Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 It's not complicated' date=' and you can apply it to any sport with weight divisions. "If you knew what it was" lol[/quote'] Technically, you can apply it to any sport with weight classes, just not in a way that makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwGSP Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 then why are you in this thread :confused: Why not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carnages Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 Why not? well because you care obviously! FRANKIE EDGAR #2 ****ERS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
classicboxer Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 Technically' date=' you can apply it to any sport with weight classes, just not in a way that makes sense.[/quote'] It's only an attempt to compare fighters, it really means nothing, and it's for entertainment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwGSP Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 well because you care obviously! FRANKIE EDGAR #2 ****ERS No need for the n-word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King_Can Posted October 9, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 No need for the n-word. lol ffs... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwGSP Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 It's only an attempt to compare fighters' date=' [b']it really means nothing[/b], and it's for entertainment. Precisely, that's why Frankie being called #2 doesn't bother me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carnages Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 No need for the n-word. lol it wasn't the n-word Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSinisterUrge Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 No need for the n-word. ......somehow I don't think it was the N-Word..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruteDion Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 And? There is no criteria for P4P' date=' I could care less who is ranked where.[/quote'] I believe rings broke it down as such -level of compation -proformance -win streak -size of compation (as in changing weightclasses) This is ment for boxing but mma hold all the key things aswell that goes into a boxing p4p ranking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwGSP Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 ......somehow I don't think it was the N-Word..... Can't be sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwGSP Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 lol it wasn't the n-word Okay, I'll take your word for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carnages Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 Okay' date=' I'll take your word for it.[/quote'] don't worry ill put GSP at number 2 if he finishes Condit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alliedwarior Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 p4p Pat Barry merks all, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwGSP Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 I believe rings broke it down as such -level of compation -proformance -win streak -size of compation (as in changing weightclasses) This is ment for boxing but mma hold all the key things aswell that goes into a boxing p4p ranking The problem is that it's all opinionated, so I don't put too much emphasis on it. I think weightlifting is the only real sport where P4P truly apllies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwGSP Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 don't worry ill put GSP at number 2 if he finishes Condit Lol wherever you want to rank him, it's your list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StompGrind Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 Oh Dana said it. It must be true then...... P4P is a bit like religious debates and usually just as retarded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enigma_Machine Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 even though i dislike Frankie, I've been saying it for a long time that Frankie is better P4P then GSP and Jon Jones. However, Aldo has done more in his division then Edgar has at 155, so I still have Aldo over Frankie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwGSP Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 Oh Dana said it. It must be true then...... P4P is a bit like religious debates and usually just as retarded. Wow....yet true.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwGSP Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 even though i dislike Frankie' date=' I've been saying it for a long time that Frankie is better P4P then GSP and Jon Jones. However, Aldo has done more in his division then Edgar has at 155, so I still have Aldo over Frankie.[/quote'] Doesn't Aldo only have 3 wins in the UFC? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruteDion Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 The problem is that it's all opinionated' date=' so I don't put too much emphasis on it. I think weightlifting is the only real sport where P4P truly apllies.[/quote'] First u said there is not criterias...well i provided them now u say well its all opinionated...dont give me that....its P4P just like how everything else is based off opinions U have a gf (i assume) be cuz her OPINIONS of u are good....opinions matter sometimes and in p4p they do aswell Bet ull be in the next thread claiming gsp is p4p better then silva Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwGSP Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 First u said there is not criterias...well i provided them now u say well its all opinionated...dont give me that....its P4P just like how everything else is based off opinions U have a gf (i assume) be cuz her OPINIONS of u are good....opinions matter sometimes and in p4p they do aswell Bet ull be in the next thread claiming gsp is p4p better then silva All I did was criticize the criteria you gave. Those are not official, just what you use. There is no real criteria. I could choose the guy I think is best at video games, would I be wrong? Nope, and no one would be able to prove me wrong. It makes no sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruteDion Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 even though i dislike Frankie' date=' I've been saying it for a long time that Frankie is better P4P then GSP and Jon Jones. However, Aldo has done more in his division then Edgar has at 155, so I still have Aldo over Frankie.[/quote'] Frankie Gray Bjpenn X2 Sean sherk Jim miller Mark bocek Hermas franca Tyson griffin Spencer fisher?? Aldo Kenflo mark hominick Urijah faber Mike brown Manny gambuyan Brookings??? Cub swanson??? I give it to frankie with him being the same size as aldo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruteDion Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 All I did was criticize the criteria you gave. Those are not official' date=' just what you use. There is no real criteria. I could choose the guy I think is best at video games, would I be wrong? Nope, and no one would be able to prove me wrong. It makes no sense.[/quote'] Thats not my criteria its RINGS so it has weight Its official for boxing yes...in which can be applyed to mma based off the idea that mma ranking and weightclasses are built in a common way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwGSP Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 Thats not my criteria its RINGS so it has weight Its official for boxing yes...in which can be applyed to mma based off the idea that mma ranking and weightclasses are built in a common way I don't think it's official in boxing either......they had a Pacqiauo-Mayweather P4P debate just 3 weeks ago. If you think it's legit, that's fine. I don't, and probably never will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
classicboxer Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 It's not official in boxing. Ring Magazine takes a vote and then says one boxer is #1 P4P, but there is no way to prove it. It's just for fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruteDion Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 It's not official in boxing. Ring Magazine takes a vote and then says one boxer is #1 P4P' date=' but there is no way to prove it. It's just for fun.[/quote'] Why u ruin my fun with ur truth...i never troll and u ruined it for me man Im not go at it..he was not getting mad...its not my thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruteDion Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 I don't think it's official in boxing either......they had a Pacqiauo-Mayweather P4P debate just 3 weeks ago. If you think it's legit' date=' that's fine. I don't, and probably never will.[/quote'] On the real dude its not legit....i think rings has it down right and ppl who take p4p ranking (not u) should uses the method of rings cuz it works the best with opinions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.