Jump to content

Had to Post This


tuf1_

Recommended Posts

so roughly 20%? god bless the nhs

 

As an American living in the UK, I've encountered the NHS over the last year. Yes, it's free - but there is a saying, you get what you pay for. And it's so true. I was absolutely shocked at the lack of professionalism and standard of care, not to mention the frustration of dealing with the NHS scheduling. I spent 4 months trying to get my GP to make an appointment with a dermatologist to get a skin cancer screening (it's been a problem throughout my life), during which I was asked, by medical professionals what "pre-melanoma was." Now I'm not doctor myself, and I didn't go to med school, but I might be able to use my powers of deduction to conclude that pre, means before...and melanoma is a type of skin cancer.

 

I went back to the States over the summer, had one consultation with my regular dermatologist - turns out, yeah I had two at risk moles, made an appointment, had them removed, and came back for a biopsy to make sure it had been thoroughly removed. All in less than 2 weeks, and the total procedure was a couple hundred bucks. Might have saved my life if they had turned into skin cancer.

 

Had I been left in the NHS, I would have heard another condescending lecture from a doctor about how "only Americans deal with preventative medicine..." and sat around and waited until they possibly became cancerous. And then, I could have enjoyed waiting for a few more months before I got any type of actual care.

 

I don't like all aspects of the American medical field, and yes it can be pricy...but if something is wrong with me, and I need some help now (and not in a few months), paying to get treatment beats getting a sympathetic "aww shucks" every time.

 

And by the way, it's not 56 million WITH insurance, it's 50.7 American without insurance. ( source: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-09-17-uninsured17_ST_N.htm ) And since America's population is 311 million, that's about 16-17% without insurance. Perfect system? Absolutely not, but hardly the image that has been previously suggested in this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an American living in the UK' date=' I've encountered the NHS over the last year. Yes, it's free - but there is a saying, you get what you pay for. And it's so true. I was absolutely shocked at the lack of professionalism and standard of care, not to mention the frustration of dealing with the NHS scheduling. I spent 4 months trying to get my GP to make an appointment with a dermatologist to get a skin cancer screening (it's been a problem throughout my life), during which I was asked, by medical professions what "pre-melanoma was." Now I'm not doctor myself, and I didn't go to med school, but I might be able to use my powers of deduction to conclude that pre, means before...and melanoma is a type of skin cancer.

 

I went back to the States over the summer, had one consultation with my regular dermatologist - turns out, yeah I had two at risk moles, made an appointment, had them removed, and came back for a biopsy to make sure they had been removed. All in less than 2 weeks, and the total procedure was a couple hundred bucks. Might have saved my life is they had turned into skin cancer.

 

Had I been left in the NHS, I would have heard another condescending lecture from a doctor about how "only Americans deal with preventative medicine..." and sat around and waited until they possibly became cancerous. And then, I could have enjoyed waiting for a few more months before I got any type of actual care.

 

I don't like all aspects of the American medical field, and yes it can be pricy...but if something is wrong with me, and I need some help now (and not in a few months), paying to get treatment beats getting a sympathetic "aww shucks" every time.

 

And by the way, it's not 56 million WITH insurance, it's 50.7 American without insurance. ( source: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-09-17-uninsured17_ST_N.htm ) And since America's population is 311 million, that's about 16-17% without insurance. Perfect system? Absolutely not, but hardly the image that has been previously suggested in this thread.[/quote']

 

This will be the best post you see in this thread. Might as well close it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an American living in the UK' date=' I've encountered the NHS over the last year. Yes, it's free - but there is a saying, you get what you pay for. And it's so true. I was absolutely shocked at the lack of professionalism and standard of care, not to mention the frustration of dealing with the NHS scheduling. I spent 4 months trying to get my GP to make an appointment with a dermatologist to get a skin cancer screening (it's been a problem throughout my life), during which I was asked, by medical professionals what "pre-melanoma was." Now I'm not doctor myself, and I didn't go to med school, but I might be able to use my powers of deduction to conclude that pre, means before...and melanoma is a type of skin cancer.

 

I went back to the States over the summer, had one consultation with my regular dermatologist - turns out, yeah I had two at risk moles, made an appointment, had them removed, and came back for a biopsy to make sure it had been thoroughly removed. All in less than 2 weeks, and the total procedure was a couple hundred bucks. Might have saved my life if they had turned into skin cancer.

 

Had I been left in the NHS, I would have heard another condescending lecture from a doctor about how "only Americans deal with preventative medicine..." and sat around and waited until they possibly became cancerous. And then, I could have enjoyed waiting for a few more months before I got any type of actual care.

 

I don't like all aspects of the American medical field, and yes it can be pricy...but if something is wrong with me, and I need some help now (and not in a few months), paying to get treatment beats getting a sympathetic "aww shucks" every time.

 

And by the way, it's not 56 million WITH insurance, it's 50.7 American without insurance. ( source: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-09-17-uninsured17_ST_N.htm ) And since America's population is 311 million, that's about 16-17% without insurance. Perfect system? Absolutely not, but hardly the image that has been previously suggested in this thread.[/quote']

 

Funny, a lot of people would never have expected to get PWNED by this guy.

 

Guess what just happened?? :D

 

P4P post!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an American living in the UK' date=' I've encountered the NHS over the last year. Yes, it's free - but there is a saying, you get what you pay for. And it's so true. I was absolutely shocked at the lack of professionalism and standard of care, not to mention the frustration of dealing with the NHS scheduling. I spent 4 months trying to get my GP to make an appointment with a dermatologist to get a skin cancer screening (it's been a problem throughout my life), during which I was asked, by medical professionals what "pre-melanoma was." Now I'm not doctor myself, and I didn't go to med school, but I might be able to use my powers of deduction to conclude that pre, means before...and melanoma is a type of skin cancer.

 

I went back to the States over the summer, had one consultation with my regular dermatologist - turns out, yeah I had two at risk moles, made an appointment, had them removed, and came back for a biopsy to make sure it had been thoroughly removed. All in less than 2 weeks, and the total procedure was a couple hundred bucks. Might have saved my life if they had turned into skin cancer.

 

Had I been left in the NHS, I would have heard another condescending lecture from a doctor about how "only Americans deal with preventative medicine..." and sat around and waited until they possibly became cancerous. And then, I could have enjoyed waiting for a few more months before I got any type of actual care.

 

I don't like all aspects of the American medical field, and yes it can be pricy...but if something is wrong with me, and I need some help now (and not in a few months), paying to get treatment beats getting a sympathetic "aww shucks" every time.

 

And by the way, it's not 56 million WITH insurance, it's 50.7 American without insurance. ( source: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-09-17-uninsured17_ST_N.htm ) And since America's population is 311 million, that's about 16-17% without insurance. Perfect system? Absolutely not, but hardly the image that has been previously suggested in this thread.[/quote']

 

Sorry to hear that. I had a similar thing with a mole on my head that was discoloured, I got a GP appointment the next day, and hospital two days after that, as a full time student, didn't pay a penny up front. Where abouts were you when you tried to get your appointment?

 

Private is available, but I think the system that we have in the UK is a good thing, considering the current economy. I definitely see your side of things though.

 

Seems I was given a dud stat by Bubba :(

 

I've just got a quote for private insurance and it came to ?1090 a year, I went for the basic things that I would expect, and they wouldn't be willing to cover me in the event that I started getting paid to play football, so I am very glad to have the nhs to fall back on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear that. I had a similar thing with a mole on my head that was discoloured' date=' I got a GP appointment the next day, and hospital two days after that, as a full time student, didn't pay a penny up front. Where abouts were you when you tried to get your appointment?

 

Private is available, but I think the system that we have in the UK is a good thing, considering the current economy. I definitely see your side of things though.

 

Seems I was given a dud stat by Bubba :(

 

I've just got a quote for private insurance and it came to ?1090 a year, I went for the basic things that I would expect, and they wouldn't be willing to cover me in the event that I started getting paid to play football, so I am very glad to have the nhs to fall back on[/quote']

 

I live in the Richmond area. And hey, I know every country has their strengths and weaknesses when it comes to the medical field. The simple truth is, it's a fast changing, very expensive, and ripe with flaws no matter how you present it. Medicine isn't straight forward and no matter who promises you something, it's going to come with a degree of difficulty. Which, I say, let's discuss that, let's explore the difficulties. Can't find solutions until we discover and understand the problems.

 

I just didn't want false information floating about.

 

But yes' date=' I agree that it isn't perfect, but what is?[/quote']

 

Too true.

 

(By the way, my original post wasn't intended with the harsh tone that was delivered. After rereading it, I realize it may have come off as snarky or a bit hostile. Fortunately, I think jd knows me well enough to not take it personally.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha, not a problem, tone doesn't transfer well over the internet.

 

What I will say is though, if I was previously on private and had to downgrade to nhs, I would more than likely notice the difference and have a different stance on this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...