PRIDEFCMAN Posted September 6, 2012 Report Share Posted September 6, 2012 We know how bad judges judge so if it works for ufc undisputed why not make that for RL they cant theoretically judge much worse! I think that it is possible to build it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yesterdays_Hero Posted September 6, 2012 Report Share Posted September 6, 2012 We know how bad judges judge so if it works for ufc undisputed why not make that for RL they cant theoretically judge much worse! It doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manho Posted September 6, 2012 Report Share Posted September 6, 2012 Im afraid aggressiveness cannot be judge by a machine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRIDEFCMAN Posted September 6, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 6, 2012 It doesn't. We will use another game! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRIDEFCMAN Posted September 6, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 6, 2012 Im afraid aggressiveness cannot be judge by a machine. It is possible! It would look like this Diaz made +5 miles in fight Condit did -10(measuring of walking forward-backward) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RogerJones620 Posted September 6, 2012 Report Share Posted September 6, 2012 Not really, but I wouldn't mind seeing the statistics displayed (ie. fightmetrics) while the fight is going on. I know that there are other fight organizations that do this in between rounds (show number of hits, take downs, submission attempts etc.). That would be cool for me, but I guess the UFC is afraid it could discourage fans even more when poor judging occurred. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MetatronBJJ Posted September 6, 2012 Report Share Posted September 6, 2012 They need real judges like Judge Judy. They can wear their robes down to ring side, put them on the raised bench like in court, have a bailiff deliver the score cards to Bruce Buffer, and it would make everything look really official. What do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarWest® Posted September 6, 2012 Report Share Posted September 6, 2012 Of course we need a judging machine Fights should only be judged on amount of strikes landed and takedowns completed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmajunkie123 Posted September 6, 2012 Report Share Posted September 6, 2012 No. They just need judges who know whats on which they clearly don't have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMAJess Posted September 6, 2012 Report Share Posted September 6, 2012 Realistically the only way to make sure the judges get it right is to allow them to watch the fight after it happens, give them the ability to view it in slow motion with different camera angles, and cast their vote after they're done. Obviously that isn't gonna happen, so the best option is to get better judges. Thinking they could make a judging machine because it works in a video game is one of the dumber things I've read on these forums........nowhere near the dumbest, but it's up there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRIDEFCMAN Posted September 6, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 6, 2012 What if wouldn't be 3 judges already like 20 of them they cant all ****up or they can? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stubert Posted September 6, 2012 Report Share Posted September 6, 2012 it would turn into a game of tig, who touches the other person the most, Frankie Edgar 'esque' Don't get me wrong i love frankie but a machine cant measure damage or aggression Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epilogue1406051983 Posted September 6, 2012 Report Share Posted September 6, 2012 they should have sensors like TKD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qwerty1175 Posted September 6, 2012 Report Share Posted September 6, 2012 He is called Cecil Peoples Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMAJess Posted September 6, 2012 Report Share Posted September 6, 2012 What if wouldn't be 3 judges already like 20 of them they cant all ****up or they can? 3 good judges > 100 bad judges. It's not a matter of quantity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qwerty1175 Posted September 6, 2012 Report Share Posted September 6, 2012 Qwerty's going cray with all of his posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.