gurling Posted September 15, 2012 Report Share Posted September 15, 2012 Then they should acknowledge that he is officially the youngest champion in UFC history. And they also should acknowledge that he is on the same list as Randy and BJ. hypocrisy is annoying, they ignored Vitors feats until they wanted to hype this fight up. To hype it, they finally are saying he was the HW champ. (Which I think they should've said from the very beginning.) Also, for those of you who don't know, Vitor won the HW tournament, and won the HW belt at that point. However, they didn't say he was a HW champ until now, because it was a tournament. So, for more hype, this fight is "the 'official' youngest champ. vs. the 'unofficial' youngest champ. You choose who's who. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.