I had all intentions of giving boxing another chance tonight but...

[Brady969 1]

After the scoring between Adamek and Cunniningham, I won't be watching for another year or two. Clean it up guys.

[WarWest® 78,550]

Nb4ClassicBoxer

[Tapped2strikes 0]

Was it bad?

[Brady969 1]

Was it bad?

 

Cunningham won but they declared it a draw and then came back and said there was a mistake in the scoring and gave it to Adamek. Wow....lol

[classicboxer 15,040]

Cunningham won but they declared it a draw and then came back and said there was a mistake in the scoring and gave it to Adamek. Wow....lol

 

Cunningham won 1,2,and 5. The scoring in MMA is exceptional!

[Kevbo_Jones 76]

Cunningham won but they declared it a draw and then came back and said there was a mistake in the scoring and gave it to Adamek. Wow....lol

 

The bookies must not have agreed with a draw, I'm guessing.

[Kevbo_Jones 76]

Cunningham won 1' date='2,and 5. The scoring in MMA is exceptional![/quote']

 

Red Herring. He is talking about a boxing match. Your pointless comment on MMA scoring(which not many disagree with anyway) is COMPLETELY irrelevant. I'm starting to think your old age is catching up with you because you seem incapable of having a discussion about anything without a running log of logical fallacies.

[StompGrind 40,571]

Red Herring. He is talking about a boxing match. Your pointless comment on MMA scoring(which not many disagree with anyway) is COMPLETELY irrelevant. I'm starting to think your old age is catching up with you because you seem incapable of having a discussion about anything without a running log of logical fallacies.

 

Hespect yo elders.

[classicboxer 15,040]

Red Herring. He is talking about a boxing match. Your pointless comment on MMA scoring(which not many disagree with anyway) is COMPLETELY irrelevant. I'm starting to think your old age is catching up with you because you seem incapable of having a discussion about anything without a running log of logical fallacies.

 

Still butthurt about losing the gun debate?

 

Edit: The implication of "giving boxing another chance" automatically made it a comparison of MMA and boxing. Nice try.

[classicboxer 15,040]

Any sport where there is scoring by judges has controversy, even gymnastics and figure skating.

[Yesterdays_Hero 23,985]

Any sport where there is scoring by judges has controversy' date=' even gymnastics and figure skating.[/quote']

 

and Rap Battles

[Kevbo_Jones 76]

Still butthurt about losing the gun debate?

 

Edit: The implication of "giving boxing another chance" automatically made it a comparison of MMA and boxing. Nice try.

 

Losing the gun debate? You did the same thing there. It is almost impossible for you to have a conversation that isn't riddled with logical fallacy. You do know what that is, right?

[classicboxer 15,040]

Losing the gun debate? You did the same thing there. It is almost impossible for you to have a conversation that isn't riddled with logical fallacy. You do know what that is' date=' right?[/quote']

 

My "edit" comment proved your original post to be wrong, but as always, you ignore the comments that prove you wrong.

[Sir_Wesley_of_Wells 3,723]

Why do the posts in this thread make me think of this?:

 

[MaximumBob 1]

Why do the posts in this thread make me think of this?:

 

 

 

I call red herring. This is a logical fallacy and must be completely irrelevant to something somewhere..

 

 

 

.

[classicboxer 15,040]

Why do the posts in this thread make me think of this?:

 

 

I call red herring. This is a logical fallacy and must be completely irrelevant to something somewhere..

 

 

 

.

 

Hahahahahahahaha!

[chanman20 212]

Boxer this is about boxing not MMA nor Guns try to keep it ontopic for once i mean i know you like to troll and throw little fits when your proven wrong and people disagree with you but try to stay ontopic for once

[mmafan001 0]

i only go out of my way to watch ward fight, i usually try to see manny and racist *** mayweather

[mmafan001 0]

Why do the posts in this thread make me think of this?:

 

 

everytime i see classicboxer post that pops in my head

[classicboxer 15,040]

Boxer this is about boxing not MMA nor Guns try to keep it ontopic for once i mean i know you like to troll and throw little fits when your proven wrong and people disagree with you but try to stay ontopic for once

 

The title of the thread indirectly brings boxing vs MMA into the conversation.

[mmafan001 0]

The title of the thread indirectly brings boxing vs MMA into the conversation.

 

shut up

[Gabri1985 44]

There is bad judging in all sports with judges. More often then not they get it right.

[Kevbo_Jones 76]

The title of the thread indirectly brings boxing vs MMA into the conversation.

 

Only if you're a boxing fanboy. In no way, shape, or form was it implied. The OP stated his disdain for the scoring in one particular match. That's it. I know its difficult for you to use your brain for logical purposes, but try it. You may actually like it.

[UMCMMA 0]

Mayweather vs Guerrero May 4th Cinco De Mayo? That'll be a blowout and hilarious to see Guerrero get embarrassed. Then Mayweather vs Alvarez in September? I can't wait to see the 23 year old get smashed because of his terrible defense. Mayweather is too much for either of them. But they will be exciting fights.

[classicboxer 15,040]

Cunningham won 1' date='2,and 5. The scoring in MMA is exceptional![/quote']

 

So this made half the forum cry?

[Kevbo_Jones 76]

So this made half the forum cry?

 

Actually, you're the one crying and brought up the red herring to protect your precious boxing. You really don't know how to use your brain. Do you?

[UMCMMA 0]

Actually' date=' you're the one crying and brought up the red herring to protect your precious boxing. You really don't know how to use your brain. Do you?[/quote']

 

Khan's back, and Gamboa vs Broner, that fight will be a barn burner.

[classicboxer 15,040]

Only if you're a boxing fanboy. In no way' date=' shape, or form was it implied. The OP stated his disdain for the scoring in one particular match. That's it. I know its difficult for you to use your brain for logical purposes, but try it. You may actually like it.[/quote']

 

It either did or didn't, and you just admitted it did. "Only if" is a stupid statement. It either did or didn't.

[Brady969 1]

Only if you're a boxing fanboy. In no way' date=' shape, or form was it implied. The OP stated his disdain for the scoring in one particular match. That's it. I know its difficult for you to use your brain for logical purposes, but try it. You may actually like it.[/quote']

 

Yes. I wasn't comparing it MMA. There's no comparison!

[classicboxer 15,040]

Yes. I wasn't comparing it MMA. There's no comparison!

 

Correct. The fight of the year in all combat sports was Pacquiao vs Marquez 4.

[Tapped2strikes 0]

Correct. The fight of the year in all combat sports was Pacquiao vs Marquez 4.

Actually, it was KZ/Poirier.

[classicboxer 15,040]

Actually' date=' it was KZ/Poirier.[/quote']

 

Among hardcore MMA fans, probably. However 99% of the world never heard of it. Everyone knows about Pacquiao vs Marquez.

[JohnnyZadar 130]

Yes. I wasn't comparing it MMA. There's no comparison!

 

:confused:your ****ed

[CyberSlayer 18]

Among hardcore MMA fans' date=' probably. However 99% of the world never heard of it. Everyone knows about Pacquiao vs Marquez.[/quote']

 

Boxing hardly has fighters who are household names,but the ones they have are more recognizable than any MMA fighter..However the world knows who Pacquiao is more than any other Boxer there is right now,Mayweather or Klitschko aren't as popular as Pac is on the world stage..After this batch of boxers I don't see any true superstars coming out of boxing for a while,you don't even hear or see anything about the Heavyweight title anymore,used to be every Heavyweight title bought was a media event..

[Kevbo_Jones 76]

Among hardcore MMA fans' date=' probably. However 99% of the world never heard of it. Everyone knows about Pacquiao vs Marquez.[/quote']

 

That's because it was a brutal KO of probably the last internationally recognized boxer left. You get more ridiculous by the day...

[classicboxer 15,040]

Boxing hardly has fighters who are household names' date='but the ones they have are more recognizable than any MMA fighter..However the world knows who Pacquiao is more than any other Boxer there is right now,Mayweather or Klitschko aren't as popular as Pac is on the world stage..After this batch of boxers I don't see any true superstars coming out of boxing for a while,you don't even hear or see anything about the Heavyweight title anymore,used to be every Heavyweight title bought was a media event..[/quote']

 

I agree, and I wish there were some better heavyweights to challenge the Klitschko brothers before they retire. However, I think boxing fans are excited about several young, up and coming superstars, there have been some great performances lately.

[classicboxer 15,040]

That's because it was a brutal KO of probably the last internationally recognized boxer left. You get more ridiculous by the day...

 

You just said I was correct and rediculous at the same time.