Nova__ Posted January 4, 2013 Report Share Posted January 4, 2013 Who would take this fight? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarWest® Posted January 4, 2013 Report Share Posted January 4, 2013 Sanchez Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZaGOAT Posted January 4, 2013 Report Share Posted January 4, 2013 Pettis by Headkick KO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cruz2990 Posted January 4, 2013 Report Share Posted January 4, 2013 Pettis would kill Deigo come on man everyone knows that...... B-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nova__ Posted January 4, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2013 The stand up favors Anthony heavily but Diego could maul him on the ground. He won't be as tentative as Guida and will attack with some real GnP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cruz2990 Posted January 4, 2013 Report Share Posted January 4, 2013 The stand up favors Anthony heavily but Diego could maul him on the ground. He won't be as tentative as Guida and will attack with some real GnP Yeah but Pattis has been working alot on his wreskling...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarWest® Posted January 4, 2013 Report Share Posted January 4, 2013 Pettis would kill Deigo come on man everyone knows that...... B-) No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cruz2990 Posted January 4, 2013 Report Share Posted January 4, 2013 Pettis would kill Deigo come on man everyone knows that...... B-) No Warewest sorry but you will soon find out that the only one that was truely overrated was Nate Diaz...... B-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarWest® Posted January 4, 2013 Report Share Posted January 4, 2013 Pettis would kill Deigo come on man everyone knows that...... B-) No Warewest sorry but you will soon find out that the only one that was truely overrated was Nate Diaz...... B-) :-q Title shot > No title shot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nova__ Posted January 4, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2013 The stand up favors Anthony heavily but Diego could maul him on the ground. He won't be as tentative as Guida and will attack with some real GnP Yeah but Pattis has been working alot on his wreskling...... He did well against Stephens who is as inconsistent as they come even in the mid/low tier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo_Junior_AldoFTW Posted January 4, 2013 Report Share Posted January 4, 2013 If Diego is motivated he could well win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Showtime216 Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Title shot off a loss but I guess it's better then not getting one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TinychatBtarrdz Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Diego Sanchez by viscous first round knockout. WAR NIGHTMARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yesterdays_Hero Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Diego UD. Pettis would wreck him if the fight was to take place on the feet, but it wouldn't. Pettis is still pretty good on the ground but I think Diego could do what Guida did while actually attacking, instead of just holding position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TinychatBtarrdz Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Diego UD. Pettis would wreck him if the fight was to take place on the feet, but it wouldn't. Pettis is still pretty good on the ground but I think Diego could do what Guida did while actually attacking, instead of just holding position. Diego would knock him out cold before any real strategy would need to come into play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junglebird Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Pettis is the most overrated UFC LW in the world <---- his title. 2-1 in the UFC. SD win to Stephens, UD loss to Guido the running man? Bendo Cerrone Maynard Diaz Miller Frankie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yesterdays_Hero Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Pettis is the most overrated UFC LW in the world <---- his title. 2-1 in the UFC. SD win to Stephens, UD loss to Guido the running man? Bendo Cerrone Maynard Diaz Miller Frankie Jim Miller is overrated, he has no wins against top lightweights. Frankie #1.. 2,3,4,5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TinychatBtarrdz Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Bendo lost twice to Frankie so I don't even think he should be on that list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junglebird Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Frankie cant win a fight without squeaking by the scorecards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yesterdays_Hero Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Frankie cant win a fight without squeaking by the scorecards. He's the Condit of LW/FW... except he doesn't run and is the GOAT of his division Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junglebird Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Frankie is the Jake shields of UFC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TinychatBtarrdz Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Henderson will never be able to claim GOAT because deep down he knows Frankie beat him both times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R_A_P_music Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Diego would Tko pettis via ground n pound. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawkmma1 Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Frankie is the Jake shields of UFC No. Just no, he may be a point fighter but he is not a one dimensional lay and pray fighter. He has a boxing style with great takedowns, anyone who can take down maynard and bendo at lw, especially someone who weighs 15-20lbs less is impressive. As for Pettis/Diego I have Pettis, I think the Guida fight taught him a lot, I hope he beats Cerrone and get's a shot at Henderson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yesterdays_Hero Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Frankie is the Jake shields of UFC Even though that's completely ridiculous it's still better than being the Carlos Condit of the UFC. Shields > Condit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enigma_Machine Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Pettis would kill Deigo come on man everyone knows that...... B-) No Warewest sorry but you will soon find out that the only one that was truely overrated was Nate Diaz...... B-) :-q Title shot > No title shot Staying in the ufc and getting a title shot > getting cut from the ufc, then coming back and getting two easy title shots and blowing one of them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junglebird Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Yes, let us praise Frankie for narrowly winning the title, then narrowly defending it thanks to the graces of judges. Then losing it by a landslide, crying for a rematch, losing by a slim margin and then having the audacity to complain about judges scorecards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yesterdays_Hero Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Yes, let us praise Frankie for narrowly winning the title, then narrowly defending it thanks to the graces of judges. Then losing it by a landslide, crying for a rematch, losing by a slim margin and then having the audacity to complain about judges scorecards. You mean winning by a large margin (4 rounds to 1) and complaining about the judges score cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junglebird Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Yes, let us praise Frankie for narrowly winning the title, then narrowly defending it thanks to the graces of judges. Then losing it by a landslide, crying for a rematch, losing by a slim margin and then having the audacity to complain about judges scorecards. You mean winning by a large margin (4 rounds to 1) and complaining about the judges score cards. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawkmma1 Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Yes, let us praise Frankie for narrowly winning the title, then narrowly defending it thanks to the graces of judges. Then losing it by a landslide, crying for a rematch, losing by a slim margin and then having the audacity to complain about judges scorecards. Really, he has beaten BJ, Maynard, Fisher, Griffin, and Sherk while fighting at his natural weight, that is not impressive? Also he should have won the second decision against Benson and I like both of them. I think it's funny when someone shows no respect for a former or current champion, they obviously did something right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nyte Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Pettis. That's a great fight though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junglebird Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Yes, let us praise Frankie for narrowly winning the title, then narrowly defending it thanks to the graces of judges. Then losing it by a landslide, crying for a rematch, losing by a slim margin and then having the audacity to complain about judges scorecards. Really, he has beaten BJ, Maynard, Fisher, Griffin, and Sherk while fighting at his natural weight, that is not impressive? Also he should have won the second decision against Benson and I like both of them. I think it's funny when someone shows no respect for a former or current champion, they obviously did something right. BJ Maynard and Griffin were all either close robberies, gift draws or blatant robberies (with Griffin) when frankie spends his career robbing decisions then gets 'robbed' by Benson he had it coming to him. Judges cant be on his side forever. Then Frankie's hypocritical reaction tops the cake - after riding the judges jockstrap for decisions he could have lost for the majority of his biggest fights he throws a tantrum when he finally loses one of those close decisions. Frankie got accustomed to judges siding with him - his loss to benson in the rematch was well deserved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King_Can Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Pettis is too active off his back, and in the stand up. Pettis all day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawkmma1 Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Okay, close calls or not he still beat guys that outweighed him in most match ups and became the LW champion. Anyone with a 14-3-1 record with the 2 losses being close and being a former champion is obviously a very good mixed martial artist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junglebird Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Okay, close calls or not he still beat guys that outweighed him in most match ups and became the LW champion. Anyone with a 14-3-1 record with the 2 losses being close and being a former champion is obviously a very good mixed martial artist. fine fine.... hes a good fighter, I admire his heart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawkmma1 Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 lol I know you clearly don't like him, i understand some of your points too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EightLimbAssassin Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 <. ockquote class="Quote" rel="Junglebird">Yes, let us praise Frankie for narrowly winning the title, then narrowly defending it thanks to the graces of judges. Then losing it by a landslide, crying for a rematch, losing by a slim margin and then having the audacity to complain about judges scorecards. You mean winning by a large margin (4 rounds to 1) and complaining about the judges score cards. i Fail. Id love for you to tell me what Frankie did to decisively win those rounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarWest® Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Yes, let us praise Frankie for narrowly winning the title, then narrowly defending it thanks to the graces of judges. Then losing it by a landslide, crying for a rematch, losing by a slim margin and then having the audacity to complain about judges scorecards. Really, he has beaten BJ, Maynard, Fisher, Griffin, and Sherk while fighting at his natural weight, that is not impressive? Also he should have won the second decision against Benson and I like both of them. I think it's funny when someone shows no respect for a former or current champion, they obviously did something right. BJ Maynard and Griffin were all either close robberies, gift draws or blatant robberies (with Griffin) when frankie spends his career robbing decisions then gets 'robbed' by Benson he had it coming to him. Judges cant be on his side forever. Then Frankie's hypocritical reaction tops the cake - after riding the judges jockstrap for decisions he could have lost for the majority of his biggest fights he throws a tantrum when he finally loses one of those close decisions. Frankie got accustomed to judges siding with him - his loss to benson in the rematch was well deserved. P4P post ^^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yesterdays_Hero Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 ^ Out-strike, aggressor, octagon control, knock down Benson. and considering it was contested on the feet, out striking him is really the only thing that mattered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EightLimbAssassin Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 ^Out-strike, aggressor, octagon control, knock down Benson. and considering it was contested on the feet, out striking him is really the only thing that mattered. Theres no doubt Frankie won the secomd round. But from then on it was all Benson landing the better and more effective shots. Aggressor, octogon control!? Lol.. his jersey shore dancework can be misleading. He can move around like that all he wants. Thats not being the aggressor. Bottom line here is if you cant tell me how Frankie decisively won 2 other rounds here than how is it a robbery? Close fight? Sure. Robbery? Not even close. Fights like that the champion should be favored the majority of the time. You want to be the champ BEAT HIM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yesterdays_Hero Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 ^Out-strike, aggressor, octagon control, knock down Benson. and considering it was contested on the feet, out striking him is really the only thing that mattered. Theres no doubt Frankie won the secomd round. But from then on it was all Benson landing the better and more effective shots. Aggressor, octogon control!? Lol.. his jersey shore dancework can be misleading. He can move around like that all he wants. Thats not being the aggressor. Bottom line here is if you cant tell me how Frankie decisively won 2 other rounds here than how is it a robbery? Close fight? Sure. Robbery? Not even close. Fights like that the champion should be favored the majority of the time. You want to be the champ BEAT HIM. ^Out-strike, aggressor, octagon control, knock down Benson. and considering it was contested on the feet, out striking him is really the only thing that mattered. Theres no doubt Frankie won the secomd round. But from then on it was all Benson landing the better and more effective shots. Aggressor, octogon control!? Lol.. his jersey shore dancework can be misleading. He can move around like that all he wants. Thats not being the aggressor. Bottom line here is if you cant tell me how Frankie decisively won 2 other rounds here than how is it a robbery? Close fight? Sure. Robbery? Not even close. Fights like that the champion should be favored the majority of the time. You want to be the champ BEAT HIM. Yeah, Frankie was robbed. He clearly deserved to win and the judges gave the fight to Benson. = Robbery. That whole "you have to beat the champ" thing you always bring up is stupid. You don't have to do anything different against the champion than you would any other fight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EightLimbAssassin Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 ^Out-strike, aggressor, octagon control, knock down Benson. and considering it was contested on the feet, out striking him is really the only thing that mattered. Theres no doubt Frankie won the secomd round. But from then on it was all Benson landing the better and more effective shots. Aggressor, octogon control!? Lol.. his jersey shore dancework can be misleading. He can move around like that all he wants. Thats not being the aggressor. Bottom line here is if you cant tell me how Frankie decisively won 2 other rounds here than how is it a robbery? Close fight? Sure. Robbery? Not even close. Fights like that the champion should be favored the majority of the time. You want to be the champ BEAT HIM. ^Out-strike, aggressor, octagon control, knock down Benson. and considering it was contested on the feet, out striking him is really the only thing that mattered. Theres no doubt Frankie won the secomd round. But from then on it was all Benson landing the better and more effective shots. Aggressor, octogon control!? Lol.. his jersey shore dancework can be misleading. He can move around like that all he wants. Thats not being the aggressor. Bottom line here is if you cant tell me how Frankie decisively won 2 other rounds here than how is it a robbery? Close fight? Sure. Robbery? Not even close. Fights like that the champion should be favored the majority of the time. You want to be the champ BEAT HIM. Yeah, Frankie was robbed. He clearly deserved to win and the judges gave the fight to Benson. = Robbery. That whole "you have to beat the champ" thing you always bring up is stupid. You don't have to do anything different against the champion than you would any other fight. Benson won 9/10 rounds with Frankie. He dominated him twice. Deal with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
basement Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 I really dont understand you lot? Pettis has a sick, offensive gaurd and is always great to watch and yet there is dislike? He also very nearly subbed the carpet guida but got saved by the bell. I got pettis winning this all day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yesterdays_Hero Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 ^Out-strike, aggressor, octagon control, knock down Benson. and considering it was contested on the feet, out striking him is really the only thing that mattered. Theres no doubt Frankie won the secomd round. But from then on it was all Benson landing the better and more effective shots. Aggressor, octogon control!? Lol.. his jersey shore dancework can be misleading. He can move around like that all he wants. Thats not being the aggressor. Bottom line here is if you cant tell me how Frankie decisively won 2 other rounds here than how is it a robbery? Close fight? Sure. Robbery? Not even close. Fights like that the champion should be favored the majority of the time. You want to be the champ BEAT HIM. ^Out-strike, aggressor, octagon control, knock down Benson. and considering it was contested on the feet, out striking him is really the only thing that mattered. Theres no doubt Frankie won the secomd round. But from then on it was all Benson landing the better and more effective shots. Aggressor, octogon control!? Lol.. his jersey shore dancework can be misleading. He can move around like that all he wants. Thats not being the aggressor. Bottom line here is if you cant tell me how Frankie decisively won 2 other rounds here than how is it a robbery? Close fight? Sure. Robbery? Not even close. Fights like that the champion should be favored the majority of the time. You want to be the champ BEAT HIM. Yeah, Frankie was robbed. He clearly deserved to win and the judges gave the fight to Benson. = Robbery. That whole "you have to beat the champ" thing you always bring up is stupid. You don't have to do anything different against the champion than you would any other fight. Benson won 9/10 rounds with Frankie. He dominated him twice. Deal with it. I'm glad you can count...... to potato Frankie 2,3,4,5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EightLimbAssassin Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 ^Out-strike, aggressor, octagon control, knock down Benson. and considering it was contested on the feet, out striking him is really the only thing that mattered. Theres no doubt Frankie won the secomd round. But from then on it was all Benson landing the better and more effective shots. Aggressor, octogon control!? Lol.. his jersey shore dancework can be misleading. He can move around like that all he wants. Thats not being the aggressor. Bottom line here is if you cant tell me how Frankie decisively won 2 other rounds here than how is it a robbery? Close fight? Sure. Robbery? Not even close. Fights like that the champion should be favored the majority of the time. You want to be the champ BEAT HIM. ^Out-strike, aggressor, octagon control, knock down Benson. and considering it was contested on the feet, out striking him is really the only thing that mattered. Theres no doubt Frankie won the secomd round. But from then on it was all Benson landing the better and more effective shots. Aggressor, octogon control!? Lol.. his jersey shore dancework can be misleading. He can move around like that all he wants. Thats not being the aggressor. Bottom line here is if you cant tell me how Frankie decisively won 2 other rounds here than how is it a robbery? Close fight? Sure. Robbery? Not even close. Fights like that the champion should be favored the majority of the time. You want to be the champ BEAT HIM. Yeah, Frankie was robbed. He clearly deserved to win and the judges gave the fight to Benson. = Robbery. That whole "you have to beat the champ" thing you always bring up is stupid. You don't have to do anything different against the champion than you would any other fight. Benson won 9/10 rounds with Frankie. He dominated him twice. Deal with it. I'm glad you can count...... to potato Frankie 2,3,4,5 Smooth 1,2,3,4,5/ 1,3,4,5. You mad bro? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yesterdays_Hero Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 ^Out-strike, aggressor, octagon control, knock down Benson. and considering it was contested on the feet, out striking him is really the only thing that mattered. Theres no doubt Frankie won the secomd round. But from then on it was all Benson landing the better and more effective shots. Aggressor, octogon control!? Lol.. his jersey shore dancework can be misleading. He can move around like that all he wants. Thats not being the aggressor. Bottom line here is if you cant tell me how Frankie decisively won 2 other rounds here than how is it a robbery? Close fight? Sure. Robbery? Not even close. Fights like that the champion should be favored the majority of the time. You want to be the champ BEAT HIM. ^Out-strike, aggressor, octagon control, knock down Benson. and considering it was contested on the feet, out striking him is really the only thing that mattered. Theres no doubt Frankie won the secomd round. But from then on it was all Benson landing the better and more effective shots. Aggressor, octogon control!? Lol.. his jersey shore dancework can be misleading. He can move around like that all he wants. Thats not being the aggressor. Bottom line here is if you cant tell me how Frankie decisively won 2 other rounds here than how is it a robbery? Close fight? Sure. Robbery? Not even close. Fights like that the champion should be favored the majority of the time. You want to be the champ BEAT HIM. Yeah, Frankie was robbed. He clearly deserved to win and the judges gave the fight to Benson. = Robbery. That whole "you have to beat the champ" thing you always bring up is stupid. You don't have to do anything different against the champion than you would any other fight. Benson won 9/10 rounds with Frankie. He dominated him twice. Deal with it. I'm glad you can count...... to potato Frankie 2,3,4,5 Smooth 1,2,3,4,5/ 1,3,4,5. You mad bro? Not really, no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nova__ Posted January 5, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 How did this become a Frankie thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EightLimbAssassin Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 How did this become a Frankie thread? When YH displayed his mass amount of butthurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yesterdays_Hero Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 How did this become a Frankie thread? All threads are Frankie threads waiting to be converted. We all bow down to EdGOD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R_A_P_music Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 How did this become a Frankie thread? When YH displayed his mass amount of butthurt. True. Frankie is still a can though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.