Jump to content

Edgar won rounds 3,4,5


SilentDogood
 Share

Recommended Posts

I gave frankie 4 & 5, but couldn't give him 3 because aldo still did more damage. I don't dislike frankie, and no offense to his fans, but doesn't this arguing about the decision thing get a little old after a whike? If they guy learned to finish fights or come in with a better gameplan you wouldn't have to argue about the judges decision, would you?...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Style, control, damage, aggression & octagon control.

Based on those, Aldo wins round 3. & Edgar didn't even win both 4&5. Aldo was throwing with bad intentions, Edgar was sparring

 

Based on that Frankie won the second Benson fight, judges clearly don't score with those thins in mind.

 

What is style, did you make that up?

 

That's the criteria.

Who cares who won the 2nd Benson fight? That's nothing to do with this. Edgar needs to start fighting in the early rounds, that way every one of his fights wouldn't be a close decision. He got the wins against Penn & Griffin, he got a draw with Maynard... So can't have it both ways.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Style, control, damage, aggression & octagon control.

Based on those, Aldo wins round 3. & Edgar didn't even win both 4&5. Aldo was throwing with bad intentions, Edgar was sparring

 

Based on that Frankie won the second Benson fight, judges clearly don't score with those thins in mind.

 

What is style, did you make that up?

 

That's the criteria.

Who cares who won the 2nd Benson fight? That's nothing to do with this. Edgar needs to start fighting in the early rounds, that way every one of his fights wouldn't be a close decision. He got the wins against Penn & Griffin, he got a draw with Maynard... So can't have it both ways.

 

I never heard anything about style as a judging criteria, what is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Style, control, damage, aggression & octagon control.

Based on those, Aldo wins round 3. & Edgar didn't even win both 4&5. Aldo was throwing with bad intentions, Edgar was sparring

 

Based on that Frankie won the second Benson fight, judges clearly don't score with those thins in mind.

 

What is style, did you make that up?

 

That's the criteria.

Who cares who won the 2nd Benson fight? That's nothing to do with this. Edgar needs to start fighting in the early rounds, that way every one of his fights wouldn't be a close decision. He got the wins against Penn & Griffin, he got a draw with Maynard... So can't have it both ways.

 

I never heard anything about style as a judging criteria, what is it?

 

I got the judging criteria in front of me, granted it is British & 3 years old but I assume the laws are no different.

Says style in it, I guess it means how slick and luis the fighter is rather than his actual fighting style.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I gave him 3, 4, and 5 as well. 4 and 5 were no-brainers imo. Aldo fought a total of about 20 seconds of Rd. 5 and I'm not giving anyone a round for that. Round 3 was close but as has been pointed out Edgar actually outstruck Aldo but what is moreso he was the one trying to fight. Aldo spent the majority of the round backing up and not engaging.

 

49-46 is a joke of a scorecard in this fight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually lol'd when Edgar said he thought he won the fight.

He needs to start planning on finishing fights instead of point fighting. When you're losing and you already took all of Aldos best shots and you're still standing, don't dance around and throw faints the last 2 rounds. Go out and throw everything you have, it's not like he doesn't have the gas tank to keep up that kind of pace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To use the term "Significant" and yet not a mark or anything happened to Aldo is stretching ti a mile,is it not?Frankie is simply put an Olympic style point scorer.You cannot take 20 of Edgar's strikes and weight them in as equal to 20 of Aldo's strikes.Even the leg kicks were of no comparison.

 

The only time i would give "Quantity" the edge is if it were ridiculously overwhelming,like maybe 60 strikes to 30.I am not going to look at any fight metrics because that is just opinions on what justifies a strike,i'll use my own judgement ,since i watched all the fights closely.IMO Frankie did win round 3 or 4,i forget which round was what now,but he did win one of those decisively ,the other rounds he only marginally out struck Aldo and that is why i cannot give him those rounds,his strikes are LESS significant than Aldo's.

 

Many people seem to forget this is NOT Olympic boxing ,there is SUPPOSE to be more criteria.Who gets ring control?I would say there is an argument Aldo wins ring control in every round.Damage,who wins that?Aldo again.Who runs more and is less willing to engage,well it was back n forth at times but again i think Aldo was more willing to engage.Take down attempts?Well do you weigh in one half **** attempt more than a few fails or do you penalize him for fails?

 

IMO Aldo wins and Frankie has nobody to blame but himself,he fought the same way the entire fight and never adapted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...