Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
sobercuban

UFC 158 **OFFICIAL DISCUSSION THREAD** W/ POLL

Recommended Posts

I think Cote won round 1. Being on his back for only the last part of the round without dealing that much damage and almost getting subbed is not enough for Voelker. 10-9 Cote

 

Round 2 is clearly Cote, unless you are blind. 10-9 Cote

 

Round 3 is clearly Voelker, obviously.

 

Final decision : 29-28 Cote

 

You must be Canadian or Cote himself. Voelker won the last 2 rounds and it was a very close first round.

 

If that wasn't in Canada the right decision would have been given.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think Cote won round 1. Being on his back for only the last part of the round without dealing that much damage and almost getting subbed is not enough for Voelker. 10-9 Cote

 

Round 2 is clearly Cote, unless you are blind. 10-9 Cote

 

Round 3 is clearly Voelker, obviously.

 

Final decision : 29-28 Cote

 

You must be Canadian or Cote himself. Voelker won the last 2 rounds and it was a very close first round.

 

If that wasn't in Canada the right decision would have been given.

 

i agree and im Canadian...oh Cotes french FROM ****BEC...not Canada ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think Cote won round 1. Being on his back for only the last part of the round without dealing that much damage and almost getting subbed is not enough for Voelker. 10-9 Cote

 

Round 2 is clearly Cote, unless you are blind. 10-9 Cote

 

Round 3 is clearly Voelker, obviously.

 

Final decision : 29-28 Cote

 

You must be Canadian or Cote himself. Voelker won the last 2 rounds and it was a very close first round.

 

If that wasn't in Canada the right decision would have been given.

 

METHOD ROUND TIME TIME FORMAT REFEREE

Unan. Dec. 3 5:00 3 Rnd (5-5-5) Philippe Chartier

DETAILS

29 - 28

29 - 28

29 - 28

Fighter KD Sig. Str. Sig. Str. % Total Str. TD TD % Sub. Att. Pass Rev.

FIGHTS TOTALS

Cote 0 62 of 119 52% 86 of 145 0 of 3 0% 0 0 0

Voelker 0 52 of 119 44% 82 of 152 1 of 2 50% 0 0 0

ROUND 1

Cote 0 26 of 46 57% 46 of 68 0 of 1 0% 0 0 0

Voelker 0 15 of 39 38% 36 of 62 1 of 1 100% 0 0 0

ROUND 2

Cote 0 36 of 73 49% 40 of 77 0 of 2 0% 0 0 0

Voelker 0 37 of 80 46% 46 of 90 0 of 1 0% 0 0 0

 

Stats from FightMetric. You were saying?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think Cote won round 1. Being on his back for only the last part of the round without dealing that much damage and almost getting subbed is not enough for Voelker. 10-9 Cote

 

Round 2 is clearly Cote, unless you are blind. 10-9 Cote

 

Round 3 is clearly Voelker, obviously.

 

Final decision : 29-28 Cote

 

You must be Canadian or Cote himself. Voelker won the last 2 rounds and it was a very close first round.

 

If that wasn't in Canada the right decision would have been given.

 

METHOD ROUND TIME TIME FORMAT REFEREE

Unan. Dec. 3 5:00 3 Rnd (5-5-5) Philippe Chartier

DETAILS

29 - 28

29 - 28

29 - 28

Fighter KD Sig. Str. Sig. Str. % Total Str. TD TD % Sub. Att. Pass Rev.

FIGHTS TOTALS

Cote 0 62 of 119 52% 86 of 145 0 of 3 0% 0 0 0

Voelker 0 52 of 119 44% 82 of 152 1 of 2 50% 0 0 0

ROUND 1

Cote 0 26 of 46 57% 46 of 68 0 of 1 0% 0 0 0

Voelker 0 15 of 39 38% 36 of 62 1 of 1 100% 0 0 0

ROUND 2

Cote 0 36 of 73 49% 40 of 77 0 of 2 0% 0 0 0

Voelker 0 37 of 80 46% 46 of 90 0 of 1 0% 0 0 0

 

Stats from FightMetric. You were saying?

 

he was saying STFU ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think Cote won round 1. Being on his back for only the last part of the round without dealing that much damage and almost getting subbed is not enough for Voelker. 10-9 Cote

 

Round 2 is clearly Cote, unless you are blind. 10-9 Cote

 

Round 3 is clearly Voelker, obviously.

 

Final decision : 29-28 Cote

 

You must be Canadian or Cote himself. Voelker won the last 2 rounds and it was a very close first round.

 

If that wasn't in Canada the right decision would have been given.

 

METHOD ROUND TIME TIME FORMAT REFEREE

Unan. Dec. 3 5:00 3 Rnd (5-5-5) Philippe Chartier

DETAILS

29 - 28

29 - 28

29 - 28

Fighter KD Sig. Str. Sig. Str. % Total Str. TD TD % Sub. Att. Pass Rev.

FIGHTS TOTALS

Cote 0 62 of 119 52% 86 of 145 0 of 3 0% 0 0 0

Voelker 0 52 of 119 44% 82 of 152 1 of 2 50% 0 0 0

ROUND 1

Cote 0 26 of 46 57% 46 of 68 0 of 1 0% 0 0 0

Voelker 0 15 of 39 38% 36 of 62 1 of 1 100% 0 0 0

ROUND 2

Cote 0 36 of 73 49% 40 of 77 0 of 2 0% 0 0 0

Voelker 0 37 of 80 46% 46 of 90 0 of 1 0% 0 0 0

 

Stats from FightMetric. You were saying?

 

he was saying STFU ;)

 

Exactly what I thought, don't be butthurt please! ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think Cote won round 1. Being on his back for only the last part of the round without dealing that much damage and almost getting subbed is not enough for Voelker. 10-9 Cote

 

Round 2 is clearly Cote, unless you are blind. 10-9 Cote

 

Round 3 is clearly Voelker, obviously.

 

Final decision : 29-28 Cote

 

You must be Canadian or Cote himself. Voelker won the last 2 rounds and it was a very close first round.

 

If that wasn't in Canada the right decision would have been given.

 

METHOD ROUND TIME TIME FORMAT REFEREE

Unan. Dec. 3 5:00 3 Rnd (5-5-5) Philippe Chartier

DETAILS

29 - 28

29 - 28

29 - 28

Fighter KD Sig. Str. Sig. Str. % Total Str. TD TD % Sub. Att. Pass Rev.

FIGHTS TOTALS

Cote 0 62 of 119 52% 86 of 145 0 of 3 0% 0 0 0

Voelker 0 52 of 119 44% 82 of 152 1 of 2 50% 0 0 0

ROUND 1

Cote 0 26 of 46 57% 46 of 68 0 of 1 0% 0 0 0

Voelker 0 15 of 39 38% 36 of 62 1 of 1 100% 0 0 0

ROUND 2

Cote 0 36 of 73 49% 40 of 77 0 of 2 0% 0 0 0

Voelker 0 37 of 80 46% 46 of 90 0 of 1 0% 0 0 0

 

Stats from FightMetric. You were saying?

 

he was saying STFU ;)

 

Exactly what I thought, don't be butthurt please! ;)

 

IM NOT...butthurt????...talk to your boyfriend ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think Cote won round 1. Being on his back for only the last part of the round without dealing that much damage and almost getting subbed is not enough for Voelker. 10-9 Cote

 

Round 2 is clearly Cote, unless you are blind. 10-9 Cote

 

Round 3 is clearly Voelker, obviously.

 

Final decision : 29-28 Cote

 

You must be Canadian or Cote himself. Voelker won the last 2 rounds and it was a very close first round.

 

If that wasn't in Canada the right decision would have been given.

 

METHOD ROUND TIME TIME FORMAT REFEREE

Unan. Dec. 3 5:00 3 Rnd (5-5-5) Philippe Chartier

DETAILS

29 - 28

29 - 28

29 - 28

Fighter KD Sig. Str. Sig. Str. % Total Str. TD TD % Sub. Att. Pass Rev.

FIGHTS TOTALS

Cote 0 62 of 119 52% 86 of 145 0 of 3 0% 0 0 0

Voelker 0 52 of 119 44% 82 of 152 1 of 2 50% 0 0 0

ROUND 1

Cote 0 26 of 46 57% 46 of 68 0 of 1 0% 0 0 0

Voelker 0 15 of 39 38% 36 of 62 1 of 1 100% 0 0 0

ROUND 2

Cote 0 36 of 73 49% 40 of 77 0 of 2 0% 0 0 0

Voelker 0 37 of 80 46% 46 of 90 0 of 1 0% 0 0 0

 

Stats from FightMetric. You were saying?

 

he was saying STFU ;)

 

Exactly what I thought, don't be butthurt please! ;)

 

IM NOT...butthurt????...talk to your boyfriend ;)

 

Mouah !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it just me, or do I just not really care about the first two fights on the main card? They are so boring to me. Especially Nick Ring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm 6-2 and just so you guys know I tend to go on 3-8, 8-3, 3-8, 8-3 patterns.

 

so... I have ring, ellenberger, condit and gsp winning...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is it just me, or do I just not really care about the first two fights on the main card? They are so boring to me. Especially Nick Ring.

 

+1

 

All 4 of those fighters deserve to get cut.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ROBBERY

 

Who cares? There was no winner in that fight.

 

Ring was robbed, he cares

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ROBBERY

 

Who cares? There was no winner in that fight.

 

Ring was robbed, he cares

 

ROBBERY

 

Who cares? There was no winner in that fight.

 

Ring was robbed, he cares

 

I thought Camozzi was landing the cleaner, harder shots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ROBBERY

 

Who cares? There was no winner in that fight.

 

Ring was robbed, he cares

 

ROBBERY

 

Who cares? There was no winner in that fight.

 

Ring was robbed, he cares

 

I thought Camozzi was landing the cleaner, harder shots.

 

I have know idea :D was just bored. I do like Nick Ring tho, he is a trier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...