Jump to content

Are the Octagon’s red and blue ‘corners’ misnomers?


universallogic

Recommended Posts

I may be missing something geometrically obvious, but why does the UFC say that they assign each fighter in the Octagon a blue ‘corner’ and a red ‘corner’? It looks like, instead, that each fighter is assigned to a blue side and a red side. They usually don’t begin rounds from and rest between rounds at where two edges meet, diagonally facing each other; rather, they are at non-angular places of the Octagon, facing each other in a non-slanted way.

post-462051-0-11721600-1429075969_thumb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mma_e_leites-silva01_576.jpg

As you can see in this Picture, the champ is always fighting out of the red corner, or in some cases UFC vets(favorites) over newcomers(underdogs), Blue corner are either title contenders or underdogs. Watch the tape on the gloves, each fighter has also a red, or blue light over his corner in the back, as you can see here:

 

Ovince-Saint-Preux-Eric-Turner-ufc-159-6

You're Welcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be missing something geometrically obvious, but why does the UFC say that they assign each fighter in the Octagon a blue ‘corner’ and a red ‘corner’? It looks like, instead, that each fighter is assigned to a blue side and a red side. They usually don’t begin rounds from and rest between rounds at where two edges meet, diagonally facing each other; rather, they are at non-angular places of the Octagon, facing each other in a non-slanted way.

Yes you missed the part where someone explained that "corner" is not a geometric term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...