Jump to content

After rewatching Rob vs Izzy


OzPride

Recommended Posts

It seems like Izzy did everything he could to lose that decision without getting embarassed. 

 

Even his face when Bruce read it out, was almost dissapointed 

 

He never really went in for the kill vs Rob, basically played with his food for 25 mins  

 

It seems in R1 Rob blocked a headkick which broke something in his right hand/forearm/wrist as he only threw the right TEN times after that which I could count - plus he was severely limited after landing takedowns or getting the back a couple of times, he would engage the left arm for the choke but had no strength to lock it in afterwards. 

 

He kept it to himself, the corner telling him to throw the right, retard Bisping saying he had to throw it. He kept it stuck to the chin the entire time. 

 

From Izzy's perspective, there's no way that someone with that much fighting experience he doesn't know his opponent was hurt - yet he never went in for the kill. He had the significant striking advantage - yes Rob's lunging two-three jab-straight left's were touching him and he didn't like it, but still, I was dumfounded that he didn't just use his sheer strength and striking versatility to take over and put Rob away. 

 

Close decision which could have gone either way, but honestly to me it felt like Izzy was trying to pass the torch. 

 

Thoughts? 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't had the chance to rewatch it yet, but will do so later on with commentary muted.

I can't remember if it was Bisping or Cormier, but one of them pointed out the possibility Whittaker might have been winning. 

Those two don't need to be on commentary together though, it turns far more into conversations than actual fight commentary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, JoshNOS said:

I haven't had the chance to rewatch it yet, but will do so later on with commentary muted.

I can't remember if it was Bisping or Cormier, but one of them pointed out the possibility Whittaker might have been winning. 

Those two don't need to be on commentary together though, it turns far more into conversations than actual fight commentary.

It definitely wasn't Spits. That retard was saying Iz had won all four rounds heading into the fif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had it 49-46 Izzy. Rob wasn't doing much, and I'm really tired of giving guys the round for laying on somehody or shoving them up against the cage. That's not causing damage, it's stalling.

Izzy was just counter striking the entire fight. He had a few offensive moments, but was just standing back and letting the fight come to him more often than not.

I don't even want to see Izzy fight any of these goofball MWs. Have Chimaev back up the big talk and fight Izzy next.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ironically Izzy might end up being considered a boring champ/fighter.

The MW is clearly dying.

Sean Strickland left doubts about his tittle shot run.

Right now there are only two interesting name for Izzy: Chimaev (obviously) and the brazilian dude that beat him once (well too early but still the fact stands that guy one day did beat Izzy). 

They will probably paddle his record so they can promote it as “the biggest rematch of all times” like they love to sell lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, skillandpower said:

Ironically Izzy might end up being considered a boring champ/fighter.

The MW is clearly dying.

Sean Strickland left doubts about his tittle shot run.

Right now there are only two interesting name for Izzy: Chimaev (obviously) and the brazilian dude that beat him once (well too early but still the fact stands that guy one day did beat Izzy). 

They will probably paddle his record so they can promote it as “the biggest rematch of all times” like they love to sell lol

I think Alex Pereira beat him twice, you goober.  At least Google his name or some ****. Jesus

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, skillandpower said:

Actually that’s a good point.

I would say the same applied to Silva maybe ?

 

Maybe, but to a much lesser extent, and it was not really evident during his "prime". From his debut v Leben, to losing the belt against Weidman, Anderson fought 17 times, and I reckon only two of those were "boring" (against Leites and of course Maia). In fact, he finished all the other 15 of those fights, and picked up 12 OTN bonuses along the way.

Unfortunately, 4 of Izzy's last 5 fights have been pretty dull. He's much less active in fights than Silva was, and doesn't seem to have the same killer instinct.

Prime Silva >> Prime Izzy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...