tuf1_ Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 While I live for UFC events I'm just not as pumped for 102 and 103. With no title fights and all four fighters in the main event and co main event coming off loses it made me wonder how the card compares to some of the weaker cards of the past couple years. UFC 80 Rapid Fire: Headline fight - Penn vs Stevenson UFC 89 Headline fight - Bisping vs Leben UFC 78 Validation: Headline fight - Bisping vs Rashad UFC 95 Headline fight - Sanchez vs Stevenson UFC 93 Headline fight - Franklin vs Henderson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wing_chun Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 this is one of the hardest cards to tip for a while, last was tough too, from that perspective, in the anything can happen type fights i think they are the best considering as you said no title fights, great matchups all round Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcaneKnight Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 Big names dont always make for exciting cards.. Every fight on this maincard has potential to be fight of the night. But im reserving that award for the Couture/N-o-g fight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jade7 Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 Big names dont always make for exciting cards.. Every fight on this maincard has potential to be fight of the night. But im reserving that award for the Couture/N-o-g fight. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KJMahler Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 I'm pretty excited for the next two cards personally. But I think anything Bisping headlines it weak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpha_Omega Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 ^ Yeah I don't know why people think there needs to be a title fight every card. That's annoying. And I'll save my vote for 105. Probably smart to throw a weak card together for 105 since it'll be competing with Pacquioa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catch221406050358 Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 Nothing will come close to ufc 78 that card sucked crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
judo_phantom Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 both ufc 102 and 103 are amazing cards IMO, especially 102. you think they're less exciting because they're no title on the line <.<? i think non-title fights are generally more exciting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PipRock Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 u should've put a 'all of the above' button. as far back as i've takin notice of, since 94 they all weren't worth half the ppv fee. including 100. hendo was the only good fight. i just watched nick diaz vs. scott smith again. i would take that fight over the last year of ufc. ufc can blow me for years, i still would'nt pay for another ppv ever again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mma4431 Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 Big names dont always make for exciting cards.. Every fight on this maincard has potential to be fight of the night. But im reserving that award for the Couture/N-o-g fight. wow an intelligent response... i must be dreaming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crazybrazilian1 Posted August 30, 2009 Report Share Posted August 30, 2009 Big names dont always make for exciting cards.. Every fight on this maincard has potential to be fight of the night. But im reserving that award for the Couture/N-o-g fight. +1 when ur not talking about ur boy machida u always have a intelligent coment!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.