Jump to content

Bad decisions and fights


poopindatoilet

Recommended Posts

First all how the F@ck did simpson win?

Lawlor Took one(almost 10-8)

Lawlor took two(10-9)

Simpson took three(9-10)

So it should have been 29-28 Lawlor but THATS a ufc decision for ya.

 

FIGHTS!

*saddolah vs Bad was a good, worth watching

*Maynard was a joke,doesnt deserve a shot at Bj

Maynard cant finish and his cardio aint good enough for 5 rounds

*Dunham pulled off that devastingly impresive arm breaking armbar

 

 

To many decisions for my taste but Watever.

Feel free to leave coments and im sure disagreements

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion it was 28-28' date=' with the first round being 10-8 for Lawlor, and the next two being 10-9 for Simpson. But I was not surprised to see Simpson won being that judges rarely give out 10-8 rounds.[/quote']

 

I totally agree with your scoring of the fight......Simpson did win rounds 2 and 3, but lawler did enough in round 1 to call it a 10-8 round

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First all how the F@ck did simpson win?

Lawlor Took one(almost 10-8)

Lawlor took two(10-9)

Simpson took three(9-10)

So it should have been 29-28 Lawlor but THATS a ufc decision for ya.

 

FIGHTS!

*saddolah vs Bad was a good' date=' worth watching

*Maynard was a joke,doesnt deserve a shot at Bj

Maynard cant finish and his cardio aint good enough for 5 rounds

*Dunham pulled off that devastingly impresive arm breaking armbar

 

 

To many decisions for my taste but Watever.

Feel free to leave coments and im sure disagreements[/quote']

 

ok, first off, simpson won the second round...look at ur scores again...10-8 Lawlor, 10-9 Lawlor, 10-9 Simposn, yet u had it 29-28? those scores add up to 29-27 lawlor, this is y u r not a judge, leave the judging of fights to people who can atleast do their math.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First all how the F@ck did simpson win?

Lawlor Took one(almost 10-8)

Lawlor took two(10-9)

Simpson took three(9-10)

So it should have been 29-28 Lawlor but THATS a ufc decision for ya.

 

FIGHTS!

*saddolah vs Bad was a good' date=' worth watching

*Maynard was a joke,doesnt deserve a shot at Bj

Maynard cant finish and his cardio aint good enough for 5 rounds

*Dunham pulled off that devastingly impresive arm breaking armbar

 

 

To many decisions for my taste but Watever.

Feel free to leave coments and im sure disagreements[/quote']

 

You simpleton... Ugh, why can't people just BE SMART? It was a rough first round for A-Train, but he came back and won the next two rounds AND Maynard is just as deserving as the next guy.

 

Him and Diaz have very bad blood and it threw his game off monday night, but he's an amazing fighter--I mean he beat Frankie Edgar for God's sake, and you're gonna talk crap because he had an off night??? Guess what, he still won!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maynard may not be exciting and he may suck at finishing fights, but you can't ignore a 7-0 UFC record, he deserves a title shot whether people like it or not.

 

As for the Lawlor vs Simpson fight, I too was surprised by the decision, but I'm not one to argue against the judges decisions because I am not an mma judge, just a fan. Also we see the fight from what, 10 different angles-ish? Gotta see the fight through the judges eyes to see why the fight was scored the way it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...