coldrish Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 No need to hate my opions Gleison Tibau vs Melvin Guillard i had that fight 29-28 Gleison Tibau vs Tyson Griffin they scored it 30-27 are you kidding me i had it 29-28 Shogun vs Machida i had it 49-46 Kevin Randleman vs Bas Rutten i had it 49-46 Hammill vs Bispin you all knew it would come i had it 30-26 Bj Penn vs Gsp 1 i had it a draw Randy vs Rizzo was so long ago dont rember what i scored but i know Rizzo won Tim Sylvia vs Arvoloski 3 i had it 47-46 I missed alot of them sure im not gonna try to sound all great and say i watched all events and all fights because i havent and neither have anyone of you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UFCCagerattler Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 Couture/Gonzaga should have been a NC due to unintentional head butt. Making a guy fight 3 rounds with a broken nose from an illegal strike is bush. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coldrish Posted February 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 Couture/Gonzaga should have been a NC due to unintentional head butt. Making a guy fight 3 rounds with a broken nose from an illegal strike is bush. Didnt it happen in the second round? And its hard to see when its during a takedown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coldrish Posted February 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 Couture/Gonzaga should have been a NC due to unintentional head butt. Making a guy fight 3 rounds with a broken nose from an illegal strike is bush. Didnt it happen in the second round? And its hard to see when its during a takedown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UFCCagerattler Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 I thiught it was the first round, but it could have been the secind. Randy picked him up and slammed him and his head into his face.. Illegal strike, and it determined the outcome of the fight. I doubt ANYBODY but Randy gets that win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juzie Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 Hammil vs Bisping and Bas Rutten vs Kevin Randleman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_4 Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 Couture vs Vera- was nothing but total BS!!!!!! and i know people are gonna say "randy had control the whole fight". Control? I don't call holding someone up against the cage control. Vera had that fight, with takedowns and more striking. Machida vs Shogun- I'm not gonna say it was a terrible decision, but I think Shogun should of won, he did a bit more work, but honestly, neither of the fighters didn't do much, so I'm not gonna complain about it. Griffin vs Ortiz I- Close fight, i think Forrest did better rounds 2 and 3, I'm a Forrest fan, so thats also why I think this decision was bad. W. Silva vs Franklin- Could of went either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_4 Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 Jones vs Hammil- A terrible decision from the ref! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HBfightfan714 Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 Couture vs Vera- was nothing but total BS!!!!!! and i know people are gonna say "randy had control the whole fight". Control? I don't call holding someone up against the cage control. Vera had that fight' date=' with takedowns and more striking. Machida vs Shogun- I'm not gonna say it was a terrible decision, but I think Shogun should of won, he did a bit more work, but honestly, neither of the fighters didn't do much, so I'm not gonna complain about it. Griffin vs Ortiz I- Close fight, i think Forrest did better rounds 2 and 3, I'm a Forrest fan, so thats also why I think this decision was bad. W. Silva vs Franklin- Could of went either way.[/quote'] but being held against the cage by the older opponent is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_4 Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 but being held against the cage by the older opponent is? What do you mean? It doesn't matter if they're older or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Za_Xiong Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 You obviously don't know your MMA if your scoring like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Za_Xiong Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 Couture vs Vera- was nothing but total BS!!!!!! and i know people are gonna say "randy had control the whole fight". Control? I don't call holding someone up against the cage control. Vera had that fight' date=' with takedowns and more striking. Machida vs Shogun- I'm not gonna say it was a terrible decision, but I think Shogun lost, but honestly, neither of the fighters didn't do much, so I'm not gonna complain about it. Griffin vs Ortiz I- Close fight, i think Forrest did better rounds 2 and 3, I'm a Forrest fan, so thats also why I think this decision was bad. W. Silva vs Franklin- Could of went either way.[/quote'] Where is these too?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prodigy108 Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 Jones vs Hammil- A terrible decision from the ref! I disagree, as soon as I saw those elbows come down from Jones I knew it was gonna be a DQ... and it was the right call Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Technique Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 I disagree' date=' as soon as I saw those elbows come down from Jones I knew it was gonna be a DQ... and it was the right call[/quote'] It was the right call but that fight should have been stopped days before the illegal elbows where thrown. There were so many unanswered blows and jones didn't want to keep hitting him. He stopped looked at the ref (As hammil was still covering up doing nothing) and the ref was like keep going. One of the worst ref jobs I have ever seen. Matt was getting pounded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fozy Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 rash v bisping was dubious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jng1 Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 It was the right call but that fight should have been stopped days before the illegal elbows where thrown. There were so many unanswered blows and jones didn't want to keep hitting him. He stopped looked at the ref (As hammil was still covering up doing nothing) and the ref was like keep going. One of the worst ref jobs I have ever seen. Matt was getting pounded. fights like that are weird, cause everyone knows jones won and everyone will always know that except score card will always say otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irishsmurf09 Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 Jones vs Hammil- A terrible decision from the ref! emm naw it was the right call to dq him 4 the elbow but it maybe could of been stopped before that elbow happened jones was just dropping nice elbows on him hammil ws doing a poor job on defending himself so maybe it ws a wrong decision 2 let the fight go on but good call on the dq Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaZz3000 Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 i recommend watching tito ortiz vs vitor belfort vitor dominated him for 2 rounds and tito even admitted to being knocked out then woken up by the next shot rampage vs ninja was pretty appauling as well x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rshart45 Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 I thiught it was the first round' date=' but it could have been the secind. Randy picked him up and slammed him and his head into his face.. Illegal strike, and it determined the outcome of the fight. I doubt ANYBODY but Randy gets that win.[/quote'] im pretty sure it was his own knee that him after that huge takedown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gtp Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 I only had a "Are you SERIOUS?" moment when they read the decision for the Griffin v Guida fight in 07. I still dont understand how they scored for Griffin no matter how many times I watch it. Other than that, I think some are questionable, but justified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gtp Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 im pretty sure it was his own knee that him after that huge takedown Nope, it was a headbutt. Not only did I see it when I wathced it, but I hear everyone say the headbutt broke his nose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naivaf009 Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 Couture vs Vera. Vera clearly won that fight. Lame judgement and biased fight calling made it seem like he lost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ares9139 Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 Rampage/Ninja, Hamill/Bisping, Rutten/Randleman, Shogun/Machida amongst others. I didn't think that the Couture/Vera decision was that bad to be honest, it could've gone either way, it certainly wasn't one of the worst decisions ever. Now Starnes/Quarry, man, that was a robbery. Starnes CLEARLY won that fight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny2821 Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 I disagree' date=' as soon as I saw those elbows come down from Jones I knew it was gonna be a DQ... and it was the right call[/quote'] I don't think it was the right call at all. Hamill couldn't continue because of his shoulder, and Jones was only going to be deducted a point for what he did. It should've been a No Contest, instead a point deduction was turned into a loss because Hamill couldn't continue in the fight for an unrelated reason. I consider that a terrible decision just because it should've been a NC. Speaking of, Hamill vs Bisping was terrible. Shogun vs Machida wasn't the most questionable decision ever considering it was at least close, but I was positive that Shogun won. Forrest vs Tito 1 was Forrest's Anthony Johnson getting called technically knocked out because he had a finger stuck through his eye. The stoppage on Brandon Vera when he fought Fabricio Werdum. Marquardt losing to Thales Leites for a strike to the back of the head that he never actually even did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForrestGriffinFan101 Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 Ellenberger vs. Condit Simpson vs. Lawler Hamill vs. Bisping Bisping vs. Evans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UndisputedKing Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 Marquardt vs. Lietes Marquardt lost due to 2 pionts being deducted. The replay showed the 2nd piont deduction (punch to the back of the head) was not a punch to the back of the head. When this was known before the fight ended something should have been done about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.