ForrestGriffinFan101 Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Andre Winner is fighting Cole Miller and Pearson is fighting Dennis Siver. Cole Miller is definitley a tougher opponent than Siver IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyTH_MMA Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Actually if you think about it, Cole is a better match-up for Winner than Siver is for Pearson. Winner has better stand-up than Cole but Siver is a good grappler and could prove troublesome for Pearson. That being said, I see both Winner and Pearson pulling out the victories. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron91 Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 He Isnt, Pearson had a veteran In Aaron Riley at 105,whereas Winner had Roli Delgaldo...Nuff said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ares9139 Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Did you see Siver's fight at UFC 105? That guy can be very dangerous. Miller looked a bit pathetic against Lauzon until he got it to the ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyTH_MMA Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 . Miller looked a bit pathetic against Lauzon until he got it to the ground. Was hoping to see him get KO'ed again. Dude still acts like he's hot poop even after getting knocked out by Efrain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remedx Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Actually if you think about it' date=' Cole is a better match-up for Winner than Siver is for Pearson. Winner has better stand-up than Cole but Siver is a good grappler and could prove troublesome for Pearson. That being said, I see both Winner and Pearson pulling out the victories.[/quote'] Siver is a kickboxer. Siver is going to win with a spinning back kick, and Winner will KO miller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyTH_MMA Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Siver is a kickboxer. Siver is going to win with a spinning back kick' date=' and Winner will KO miller.[/quote'] I believe Siver also trained Judo or something or other..regardless he has more grappling experience than Pearson. But I agree with Winner KO'ing Miller. I think Pearson shows some promise though, I think he might take it to Siver. I think I was thinking of Denis Stojnic(sp?)..my mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyZadar Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 He Isnt' date=' Pearson had a veteran In Aaron Riley at 105,whereas Winner had Roli Delgaldo...Nuff said.[/quote'] +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xJoeyKucklesx Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 yep Winner and Pearson will win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slack_415 Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 both will get a win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMAxALLxDAY Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 I hope they both lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyHamer Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 I hope they both lose. Why? I hope Winner knocks Miller out cold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMAxALLxDAY Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Why? I hope Winner knocks Miller out cold. Both overrated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TapouTxX Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Both overrated. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonson86 Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 IMO it is because he dident really get challanged in his last fight and ross beat a really tuff guy in aaron riley... like someone elice said the guy ross is fighting is a good grappler and they might want to test that part of his game seeing how good he was on his feet in his last fight but you can never tell what will happen in a fight he just might loose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyHamer Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Both overrated. I don't think Pearsons overrated. He put on a great stand up clinic against a very tough Aaron Riley. Winners stand up is talked about, because he has great hands, even if he does let them drop a little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ares9139 Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 I believe Siver also trained Judo or something or other..regardless he has more grappling experience than Pearson. But I agree with Winner KO'ing Miller. I think Pearson shows some promise though' date=' I think he might take it to Siver. I think I was thinking of Denis Stojnic(sp?)..my mistake.[/quote'] Pearson is a brown belt in Judo, he knows what he's doing in a grappling situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyTH_MMA Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Pearson is a brown belt in Judo' date=' he knows what he's doing in a grappling situation.[/quote'] Hm..well I'll eat some crow..but chew on this..Siver has more experience in the UFC, regardless if most of it is the losing variety. I also corrected myself in an earlier post that I was thinking of Denis Stojnic (sp?) Regardless I'm rooting for Pearson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMAxALLxDAY Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 I don't think Pearsons overrated. He put on a great stand up clinic against a very tough Aaron Riley. Winners stand up is talked about' date=' because he has great hands, even if he does let them drop a little.[/quote'] Yes he is. His ground game has never been tested. Not even on the show. If he doenst lose by submission, he'll lose by ud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ares9139 Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Yes he is. His ground game has never been tested. Not even on the show. If he doenst lose by submission' date=' he'll lose by ud.[/quote'] You mean on the show that Pearson won a match by armbar and Winner won one by triangle choke? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMAxALLxDAY Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 You mean on the show that Pearson won a match by armbar and Winner won one by triangle choke? It was an easy armbar. I never talked about Winner's ground game. I wanna see Pearson at least fight a dominant wrestler and MAYBE ill reconsider him not being overrated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyHamer Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 You mean on the show that Pearson won a match by armbar and Winner won one by triangle choke? This saves me typing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricky_mma Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 It was an easy armbar. I never talked about Winner's ground game. I wanna see Pearson at least fight a dominant wrestler and MAYBE ill reconsider him not being overrated. lol stop typing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMAxALLxDAY Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Everyone knew that he was gonna win from the lw. I just wanna see more ground game from him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ares9139 Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Everyone knew that he was gonna win from the lw. I just wanna see more ground game from him. He's a brown belt in Judo and has shown some submission skills as well as destroying a tough guy standing up at 105, so he's not exactly one dimensional. There are far more one-dimensional over-hyped fighters in the UFC. I think it's wrong to call him over-rated because no-one talks as though he's the next big thing, they mainly just comment that he looks like a good fighter, a statement which has good evidence to support it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMAxALLxDAY Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 He's a brown belt in Judo and has shown some submission skills as well as destroying a tough guy standing up at 105' date=' so he's not exactly one dimensional. There are far more one-dimensional over-hyped fighters in the UFC. I think it's wrong to call him over-rated because no-one talks as though he's the next big thing, they mainly just comment that he looks like a good fighter, a statement which has good evidence to support it.[/quote'] Aaron Riley is a good opponent and it was a shame he lost. He just got beat. Even I could name a few one-dimensional hyped up fighters. But I just don't see him being a top contender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martino231 Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Dennis Siver is very dangerous toe to toe and on the ground. I'd definitely consider him more dangerous than Cole Miller, even if Cole is the bigger name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denominator Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Ehh, Andre Winner is a great striker, and Cole Miller is definitely not. I see Ross Pearson blowing through Dennis Silver. Dennis is a good striker, but he's nowhere near as big as Pearson is. Heck, Pearson is a huge LW. He's gotta weigh atleast 175lbs. come fight time. That being said, Andre has an easy opponent last time, while Pearson did not, as another member has pointed out. I predict a KO for Andre against Cole, and a submission by Pearson on Silver. Cool fight, though I find Andre to be far more entertaining, due to his fast hands and great combinations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aKaBeasTTT Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 He's a brown belt in Judo and has shown some submission skills as well as destroying a tough guy standing up at 105' date=' so he's not exactly one dimensional. There are far more one-dimensional over-hyped fighters in the UFC. I think it's wrong to call him over-rated because no-one talks as though he's the next big thing, they mainly just comment that he looks like a good fighter, a statement which has good evidence to support it.[/quote'] +5 Aaron Riley is a good opponent and it was a shame he lost. He just got beat. Even I could name a few one-dimensional hyped up fighters. But I just don't see him being a top contender. No one said his next match was for a shot at the title...everyone is simply saying that Ross is not one dimensional and is a good up and comer. IMO he is very humble as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmakillsallothersports Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 i dissagree i think siver is more dangerous than miller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kable Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Pearson will show another dominant performance. Winner will win if Miller is stupid enough to stand like his last fight, Winner would pounce on Miller if he rocked him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.