Guest Guest Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 does anyone else agree that ALL main events should be 5 rounds because rashad/rampage ended way too early for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRIDEneverDIED Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 typically a main event is either a title fight or a number 1 contender fight you just happened to watch a number 1 contender fight.....Rashad Shogun will be 5.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest [Deleted User] Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 typically a main event is either a title fight or a number 1 contender fight you just happened to watch a number 1 contender fight.....Rashad Shogun will be 5.... i already know the rounds for different events Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sobercuban Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 I'm still down for this .... if no other reason than added value for the PPV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smizznasty Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 does anyone else agree that ALL main events should be 5 rounds because rashad/rampage ended way too early for me I think the first 3 rounds should be 5 minutes, and the last two should be 3 minutes if it's not a title fight. Just my opinion. But If a fight does'nt win definitively then I'm not satisfied.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JHenry Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 Although id be a huge burdon to fighters to train 2x as hard for a non-title fight it needs to happen because of very indecisive matches that keep popping their heads up more and more frequently Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkofheartness Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 I think the UFC should adopt prides 10 minute first rounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad_MFR Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 does anyone else agree that ALL main events should be 5 rounds because rashad/rampage ended way too early for me Rampage looked terrible in that fight. When he had Rashad hurt he shouldve chased him down, cut off the ring and layed some heavy artillary on him. He didnt. Two more rounds would have delayed the inevitable. Rampage lost..... He was beaten by a lack of mental strength and he was rustier than a Model T Ford in Matt Hughes back field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evzy85uk Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 I don't agree that non title fight main events should be 5 rounds. It would take away that something special about the title fights. I think the people that agree with this idea are the people that wanted Rampage to win and hoped Evans was on his way out after getting rocked. Even though Evans recovered and showed dominance at the end of round 3. If that fight went another round rampage would've gotten KO'd or TKO'd because he was gassed out because of the ring rust and Evans is a cardio machine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.