Pessimist_Pete Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 Since he already beat Randy (also a Hall of Famer) shouldnt Dana consider inducting Brock in the near future? Maybe if gets like 5 or 6 wins in a row? thought about this ? discuss here thanx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
res0 Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 Lets not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piercer138 Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 Since he already beat Randy (also a Hall of Famer) shouldnt Dana consider inducting Brock in the near future? Maybe if gets like 5 or 6 wins in a row? thought about this ? discuss here thanx easy answer... !! NO !! :mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artvandelay-1 Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven_McTowelie Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 Once he beats Cain and JDS then fights Godzilla then YES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kranga Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 Bawhahahahahahahaha How about NEVER Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeilJake Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 no. wtf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pessimist_Pete Posted October 18, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 wow. lots of Brock haters here. If he wins like 5 in a row more, then he should be in the HOF. Thanx. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KodiakKid Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 Maybe someday? Give him 4 or 5 more years to prove he belongs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G__row Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badnewsBH Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 Look, I like Brock and all, but this is silly. A hall of fame induction should be for lifetime contributions to the sport, and I think Brock's time has been a bit short for that sort of honour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rain_wizard Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shinsplint Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 I think its a great idea Petey, Brock should even get his own Hall of fame. That only seems fair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IanThePhoenix Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 Only if he can get to 100 and 0 with 100 KO's... oh wait... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
booneiowaguy Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 He's got my vote!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCrazyPsychopath Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 Look' date=' I like Brock and all, but this is silly. A hall of fame induction should be for lifetime contributions to the sport, and I think Brock's time has been a bit short for that sort of honour.[/quote'] +10 other than randy, the next closest hall of fame heavy weight in the game today would be Frank Mir, and unless he gets the title, i dont think that will happen brock has a 4-1 record in the UFC i dont think any of the other inductees have less than 10 fights in the UFC and most are well over... im hoping this wasnt a serious thread... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven_McTowelie Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 Once he beats Bill Goldberg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shinsplint Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 Once he beats Bill Goldberg LMFAO I thought he had already beaten him ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pessimist_Pete Posted October 18, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 Brock already has wins over Randy, Mir, and he could easily smash Big Nog, Cro Cop, and other legends such as Kongo. So I think he should be in the HOF. discuss that point thanx. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RampageTKO Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 stfu pete you troll go away Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vulq Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 Really no, maybe in 5-10 years. When he has done just as much for the sport as the other guys in it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shinsplint Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 Brock already has wins over Randy' date=' Mir, and he could easily smash Big Nog, Cro Cop, and other legends such as Kongo. So I think he should be in the HOF. discuss that point thanx.[/quote'] This sounds like a very valid point. I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
res0 Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 HOF isn't about fight record. It's more about the impact made and that takes time. Lesnar may get in HOF one day but I don't see it happening for at least another 2 years if he continues to stay HW Champ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LESNAR16FTW Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 easy answer... !! NO !! :mad: i do not see why you wouldn't, if he beats cain he will have successfully defended the belt 3 times more then any other heavyweight champion in UFC history, also lets look at the marketign side of it lesnar is dana's cash cow when lesnar fights dana collects outrageous PPV buys, if lesnar went and talked to dana right now about beign in the hall of fame he would be put in for sure not only his outstanding accomplishments in the ring but when you have such marketign power like lesnar you are on a different level then the average fighter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shinsplint Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 i do not see why you wouldn't' date=' if he beats cain he will have successfully defended the belt 3 times more then any other heavyweight champion in UFC history, also lets look at the marketign side of it lesnar is dana's cash cow when lesnar fights dana collects outrageous PPV buys, if lesnar went and talked to dana right now about beign in the hall of fame he would be put in for sure not only his outstanding accomplishments in the ring but when you have such marketign power like lesnar you are on a different level then the average fighter[/quote'] Oh no............... Then somebody with full knowledge comes along....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarWest® Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 i do not see why you wouldn't' date=' if he beats cain he will have successfully defended the belt 3 times more then any other heavyweight champion in ufc history, also lets look at the marketign side of it lesnar is dana's cash cow when lesnar fights dana collects outrageous ppv buys, if lesnar went and talked to dana right now about beign in the hall of fame he would be put in for sure [b']not only his outstanding accomplishments in the ring[/b] but when you have such marketign power like lesnar you are on a different level then the average fighter ahahahahaha!!! Thank You I havent laughed this hard in so long! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bonesbonesbones Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 If he wins this title fight he has the most consecutive HW title defenses in UFC History He has also beaten a hall of famer. I can't say he won't deserve it someday or won't get it someday. Because he probably will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhc Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 I think he will get it some day but not now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThirstForBLOOD Posted October 18, 2010 Report Share Posted October 18, 2010 When he beats Cain, JDS, and like 2 other guys after that I would say he deserves it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaTsA Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 i do not see why you wouldn't' date=' if he beats cain he will have successfully defended the belt 3 times more then any other heavyweight champion in UFC history, [b']also lets look at the marketign side of it lesnar is dana's cash cow when lesnar fights dana collects outrageous PPV buys[/b], if lesnar went and talked to dana right now about beign in the hall of fame he would be put in for sure not only his outstanding accomplishments in the ring but when you have such marketign power like lesnar you are on a different level then the average fighter Gee, someone should maybe go look at the PPV records again. As for Lesnar getting in the HOF? Sure, if he's in the sport for a whole bunch more years he might have a chance, but certainly not in the near future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Labyrinthic Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 If he beats 5 more in a row yes.. He already beat one HOffer in Randy.. He beat 2 former ufc Champs in Randy and Mir. He beat 2 interim Champs He won his belt in his forth MMA fight He beat a former undefeated KO king If he beat?s Cain he will be the 3rd ( Correct me if im wrong) man to defend the HW title 3times in a row. If he beats Cain he beats another undefeated fighter There is some HOF material in Lesnar like it or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claymore831406051745 Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 Since he already beat Randy (also a Hall of Famer) shouldnt Dana consider inducting Brock in the near future? Maybe if gets like 5 or 6 wins in a row? thought about this ? discuss here thanx To answer your questions seriously, beating a hall of famer, does not make you a hall of famer. Brock is currently the king of the mountain in the heavyweight division, or more aptly, he is the mountain, but to be in the hall of fame requires more than that. Longevity, achievement, and affecting the sport in a posative way are main factors. I do belive Brock will be in the Hall of Fame, but not for many years and only if he keeps up what he's been doing. He's in back of a very long line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antmanx Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 I understand that his current dominance may seem like he deserves the HOF right now but he needs more time. Even if he loses to Cain, then comes back and wins the belt and defends it several more times, he would still be eligible for the HOF. It is not about records (just look at James Toney's stupid rants about Randy's record) but it is about dominance. If he defends the title around 4-5 more times, I think he will have a legit shot. Although, you also must take into account a fighter's influence on the sport. Whether you love him or hate him, Lesnar has brought in many fans that before would have never of looked at MMA. I think this point with a few more defenses will warrant him a possible HOF nod. But again, not any time soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaTsA Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 Brock already has wins over Randy' date=' Mir, and he could easily smash Big Nog, Cro Cop, and other legends such as Kongo. So I think he should be in the HOF. discuss that point thanx.[/quote'] Sorry, did you really just put Kongo in the same list of legends as Randy, Mir, Big Nog and Cro Cop? Since when is Kongo anything but a warm up fight for someone title shot bound? With outlandish statements like that, you really to hinder your credibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shinsplint Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 Sorry' date=' did you really just put Kongo in the same list of legends as Randy, Mir, Big Nog and Cro Cop? Since when is Kongo anything but a warm up fight for someone title shot bound? With outlandish statements like that, you really to hinder your credibility.[/quote'] In Ts eyes Kongo is a legend, and i gota agree. A legend a shorts grabbing and nut shots. And KaTsA, Nice Avi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No_Pantaloons Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 Stop trolling sir...... Let's put any fighter who's been 5-1 or better at some point in their career in the HoF as well. /s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raps43 Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 Nope.....but,if he will continue winning next 5 years thats a different story Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarberBeefcake Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 Gee' date=' someone should maybe go look at the PPV records again.[/b']As for Lesnar getting in the HOF? Sure, if he's in the sport for a whole bunch more years he might have a chance, but certainly not in the near future. so your saying brock's pay per views don't make the most money?????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaTsA Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 so your saying brock's pay per views don't make the most money?????? No, I am saying they don't make "outrageous PPV buys", frankly no MMA event can really claim to yet. Seriously, you need to stop trying to argue semantics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bonesbonesbones Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 Stop trolling sir...... Let's put any fighter who's been 5-1 or better at some point in their career in the HoF as well. /s Hes the only 5-1 fighter who has beaten 2 former champions and 2 interim champions ever. Also with a win he would be the only fighter ever to defend the HW title 3 consecutive times. Also he has spent a higher percent of is career as UFC heavyweight champ than anyone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobilator Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 If he stay champion for 3 more year maybe but he need more fight and a beter way to present the sport when he talk . He did HUGE mistake at UFC 100 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarberBeefcake Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 No' date=' I am saying they don't make "outrageous PPV buys", frankly no MMA event can really claim to yet. Seriously, you need to stop trying to argue semantics.[/quote'] his point was that brock is his cash cow and brock's ppv's draw the most money. Something that can't be argued because it is fact Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bonesbonesbones Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 If he stay champion for 3 more year maybe but he need more fight and a beter way to present the sport when he talk . He did HUGE mistake at UFC 100 . So barring injury thats 3 fights each year, that means he would have to defend the heavyweight title 10 to 12 times in a row for hall of fame. Damn those are high standards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobilator Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 So barring injury thats 3 fights each year' date=' that means he would have to defend the heavyweight title 10 to 12 times in a row for hall of fame. Damn those are high standards.[/quote'] Like i said is mistake at ufc 100 kinda injury is reputation in the UFC boss who decide who go in the HOF . Against he need more fight . I think 3 year is just enough . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grappler774 Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 Since he already beat Randy (also a Hall of Famer) shouldnt Dana consider inducting Brock in the near future? Maybe if gets like 5 or 6 wins in a row? thought about this ? discuss here thanx If he can clean out the division and keep a long reign, then yeah, let's put him in there. If he loses and has a mediocre reign with just a couple defenses in a row, not so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bonesbonesbones Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 Like i said is mistake at ufc 100 kinda injury is reputation in the UFC boss who decide who go in the HOF . Against he need more fight . I think 3 year is just enough . And the boss loves him, hes a little less than 12 consecutive title defenses away from HOF. Thats almost twice the UFC record and the HW division is the toughest to hold onto your belt in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobilator Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 And the boss loves him' date=' hes a little less than 12 consecutive title defenses away from HOF. Thats almost twice the UFC record and the HW division is the toughest to hold onto your belt in.[/quote'] Then we have a different opinion on who should be a HOF in MMA . I said 3 year and u said 12 consecutif title defenses ( 2 year i think ) . We can agree on 2 year and a half ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaTsA Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 his point was that brock is his cash cow and brock's ppv's draw the most money. Something that can't be argued because it is fact PPV draw potential does not equate to a place in the Hall of Fame, feel free to intelligently argue that. 5 Fights in the UFC also does not gain you entry. As I've stated, if Brock continues on his current form, sure, one day perhaps, but due to his performance as a fighter, not his ability to sell a fight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarberBeefcake Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 PPV draw potential does not equate to a place in the Hall of Fame' date=' feel free to intelligently argue that. 5 Fights in the UFC also does not gain you entry. As I've stated, if Brock continues on his current form, sure, one day perhaps, but due to his performance as a fighter, not his ability to sell a fight.[/quote'] dana could put him in for any reason he likes..........not to offend anyone but the ufc hall of fame is kind of a joke anyways Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bonesbonesbones Posted October 19, 2010 Report Share Posted October 19, 2010 Then we have a different opinion on who should be a HOF in MMA . I said 3 year and u said 12 consecutif title defenses ( 2 year i think ) . We can agree on 2 year and a half ? 2 or 3 more wins in a row at heavyweight gets him double the consecutive defenses of Randy Couture plus more. Thats hall of fame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.