Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
TornHonor

Machida vs Rampage fight metric

Recommended Posts

Fight Metric sucks.

Who won in it?

Didnt look.

And dont want to.

 

That's odd alot of Shogun fan's last year linked it in every Machida thread. It's funny how things change isn't it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

one word: octagon control

 

Thats one the reasons Rampage won

 

When a fighter is on the backfoot and the other fighter is moving forward

The judges will always give it to the fighter moving forward not the fighter moving backwards

 

So all the Machida fanboys who cry rigged can admit the Machida puzzle has now been figure out

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fight Metric sucks.

Who won in it?

Didnt look.

And dont want to.

 

Machida did, that was a disappointing way they scored it though. Apparently to them lyotos grappling made so much more points than rampages much huger amount of strikes landed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
one word: octagon control

 

Thats one the reasons Rampage won

 

When a fighter is on the backfoot and the other fighter is moving forward

The judges will always give it to the fighter moving forward not the fighter moving backwards

 

So all the Machida fanboys who cry rigged can admit the Machida puzzle has now been figure out

 

Rampage and Shogun are the only people that could beat Machida.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
one word: octagon control

 

Thats one the reasons Rampage won

 

When a fighter is on the backfoot and the other fighter is moving forward

The judges will always give it to the fighter moving forward not the fighter moving backwards

 

So all the Machida fanboys who cry rigged can admit the Machida puzzle has now been figure out

 

Why didn't he win the Forrest fight then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Besides the fact that fightmetric obviously doesn't bring into account aggression and the fact that Machida was constantly running, it still has Rampage winning the first and second rounds individually. What's your point?

 

 

Edit: By the way, in the ACTUAL FIGHT, extra points from the third round don't carry into the first and second, lawl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It says 29-29 draw.

 

Too bad they forgot to count aggressiveness, therefore making it 29-28 based on the unified rules for the winner- Rampage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL. All the Shogun/Fedor fanboys (because for some reason it seems that all Shogun fanboys also happen to love Fedor) linked this in their threads last year. GTFO you hypocrites.:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
one word: octagon control

 

Thats one the reasons Rampage won

 

When a fighter is on the backfoot and the other fighter is moving forward

The judges will always give it to the fighter moving forward not the fighter moving backwards

 

So all the Machida fanboys who cry rigged can admit the Machida puzzle has now been figure out

 

look fight metric has it significant strikes in 1st rd 12-5 for machida, which is honestly how i saw it watching at home

 

when its something like 6-6 you go with who was more aggressive, when someone clearly hit the other person more, you dont have to go to a tiebreaker like "octagon control"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's odd alot of Shogun fan's last year linked it in every Machida thread. It's funny how things change isn't it?

 

lol +1.

 

Machida was robbed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why didn't he win the Forrest fight then?

 

Forrest demostrated better octagon control in that fight after his leg kick crippled Page throughout that fight

 

Machida was trying to do the same thing

Didn't work

 

Page won fair and square

Cry it up haters

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i mean its like if we have a round, and in 3 minutes i get off on you 5 times and just avoid everything you do, you win the round just cuz your chasing me around?

 

i hit you 5 times you hit me zero, who is winning that fight?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What? Look at this...

 

Round 1 (Machida): Significant Strikes; 12, Total Strikes; 16, Leg Strikes; 12. So a Leg Kick must been a significant strike I guess. Same thing for round 2, which led to "33 Significant Strikes" for Machida.

 

Round 1 (Rampage): Significant Strikes; 5, Total Strikes; 26, Leg Strikes; 12. The same amount as Machida. Round 2 is the same as the first, with Rampage landing more strikes in every area except tying with leg strikes, yet with less significant. Then Round 3 obviously Machida won with the mount and strikes from there.

 

Jackson end up with more strikes landed total, and more strikes to the body and legs. It's just with Machida's "Significant" Leg Kicks that give Machida the fight? Yeah right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i mean its like if we have a round' date=' and in 3 minutes i get off on you 5 times and just avoid everything you do, you win the round just cuz your chasing me around?

 

i hit you 5 times [b']you hit me zero[/b], who is winning that fight?

 

so you are saying Lyoto landed nothing?? You sir have the I.Q of a biscuit!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could care less about fight metric at this point. The judging was horrible. Machida obviously outscored Rampage in the first round with his leg kicks.

 

The other rounds, we do not need to discuss.

 

Shogun fans complained for months after Machida vs Rua I, and it was not even as bad as what happened tonight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
look fight metric has it significant strikes in 1st rd 12-5 for machida' date=' which is honestly how i saw it watching at home

 

when its something like 6-6 you go with who was more aggressive, when someone clearly hit the other person more, you dont have to go to a tiebreaker like "octagon control"[/quote']

 

A fighter who keeps forward and controls the cage and cutting off the opponent (if everything else is at a stalemate) will always get the W in the judges eyes

 

Machida hugging Page against the fence as well but thats not admitted

 

Face it your boy lost

He had his chance in the 3rd but couldn't do it

 

People just need to give Page his credit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a big Machida fan. But, I can say it was a fair call. Machida lost the match, but won the fight. Big woop, theres always next fight!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It says 29-29 draw.

 

Too bad they forgot to count aggressiveness' date=' therefore making it 29-28 based on the unified rules for the winner- Rampage.[/quote']

 

Exactly, also in the fightmetric it clearly says that Rampage won Round 1 and 2.

 

23-14 Rampage (Round 1)

31-27 Rampage (Round 2)

 

By the UFC's judging by the fightmetric, Rampage still wins. I can make my own judging system where Rampage wins all 3 rounds. Not counting the aggressiveness? Lets not count any leg-kicks. Machida fails, Rampage wins.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A fighter who keeps forward and controls the cage and cutting off the opponent (if everything else is at a stalemate) will always get the W in the judges eyes

 

Machida hugging Page against the fence as well but thats not admitted

 

Face it your boy lost

He had his chance in the 3rd but couldn't do it

 

People just need to give Page his credit

 

How come Penn didn't beat Edgar the first time then? I will never understand MMA judging :'(

 

They need Chuck, Randy, and Bas to judge fights.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How come Penn didn't beat Edgar the first time then? I will never understand MMA judging :'(

 

They need Chuck' date=' Randy, and Bas to judge fights.[/quote']

 

Edgar raped Penn. Rampage landed more strikes, takedowns, and was more aggressive than Machida in Round 1 and 2. Face it, Rampage won, by judges, by forum statistics, by fightmetric. Penn is back though, he should stay at WW to get up the rankings. I would pay to see that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fightmetric doesn't tell the whole story. Octagon control and aggression was a big part in the judging for this fight, obviously. I felt Rampage won the first two rounds and clearly Machida won the third. I don't want to see an immediate rematch but I would like to see one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Octagon control, eh? I could've sworn I saw Lyoto CONTROLLING the hell out Rampage on the ground. And in the only hectic flurry of the fight.. You know, the one where Machida landed about 4-5 blows to Rampage's 1, then scored a takedown that ended up getting him the mount.

 

Hmmm... Even 'page admits he got his *** kicked. You guys need to get out of denial as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Edgar raped Penn. Rampage landed more strikes' date=' takedowns, and was more aggressive than Machida in Round 1 and 2. Face it, Rampage won, by judges, by forum statistics, by fightmetric. Penn is back though, he should stay at WW to get up the rankings. I would pay to see that.[/quote']

 

eh the 2nd fight for sure, but the first fight debatable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
so you are saying Lyoto landed nothing?? You sir have the I.Q of a biscuit!

 

lol im saying the opposite man!! im saying lyoto landed more so it shouldnt matter who was moving forward

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lol im saying the opposite man!! im saying lyoto landed more so it shouldnt matter who was moving forward

 

Then i retract my statement you are a smart man, and offer my apologies. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How come Penn didn't beat Edgar the first time then? I will never understand MMA judging :'(

 

They need Chuck' date=' Randy, and Bas to judge fights.[/quote']

 

Because Edgar was side stepping with speed in and out the pocket with rapid punches and he took Penn down and in the standup Frankie was been the aggressor and landing punches and was outworking Penn in those fights

 

 

But thats a different fight

 

Rampage won fair and square against Machida

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Octagon control' date=' eh? I could've sworn I saw Lyoto CONTROLLING the hell out Rampage on the ground. And in the only hectic flurry of the fight.. You know, the one where Machida landed about 4-5 blows to Rampage's 1, then scored a takedown that ended up getting him the mount.

 

Hmmm... Even 'page admits he got his *** kicked. You guys need to get out of denial as well.[/quote']

 

Yes Machida won the 3rd round

But lost the first 2 rounds

 

Page admitted Lyoto beat him in the 3rd round

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

judges don't count leg kicks very much... and honestly, rightfully so... if you're judging a fight from ringside what are you going to remember? jackson's flush punch to the face or lyoto's five leg kicks?

 

like I said before... the reasons why Rampage won this fight are the same reasons why Shogun lost Machida vs. Shogun 1...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Did any of you actually read the Metric round by round?? Rampage landed more total strikes in rounds one and two. A justifiable win' date=' and a good call for the judges!![/quote']

 

machida had the more "significant strikes" though... however most of them were leg kicks in the first and second so..... I digress to my last post...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
one word: octagon control

Thats one the reasons Rampage won

 

When a fighter is on the backfoot and the other fighter is moving forward

The judges will always give it to the fighter moving forward not the fighter moving backwards

 

So all the Machida fanboys who cry rigged can admit the Machida puzzle has now been figure out

 

Thats 2 words moron

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A fighter who keeps forward and controls the cage and cutting off the opponent (if everything else is at a stalemate) will always get the W in the judges eyes

 

Machida hugging Page against the fence as well but thats not admitted

 

Face it your boy lost

He had his chance in the 3rd but couldn't do it

 

People just need to give Page his credit

 

^^^

This

 

Besides who wants to see someone run for two rounds

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's odd alot of Shogun fan's last year linked it in every Machida thread. It's funny how things change isn't it?

 

it's true. Shogun fans always bought up fight metrics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What? Look at this...

 

Round 1 (Machida): Significant Strikes; 12' date=' Total Strikes; 16, Leg Strikes; 12. So a Leg Kick must been a significant strike I guess. Same thing for round 2, which led to "33 Significant Strikes" for Machida.

 

Round 1 (Rampage): Significant Strikes; 5, Total Strikes; 26, Leg Strikes; 12. The same amount as Machida. Round 2 is the same as the first, with Rampage landing more strikes in every area except tying with leg strikes, yet with less significant. Then Round 3 obviously Machida won with the mount and strikes from there.

 

Jackson end up with more strikes landed total, and more strikes to the body and legs. It's just with Machida's "Significant" Leg Kicks that give Machida the fight? Yeah right.[/quote']

 

7 more significant strikes is quite a bit more lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...