jamamaw Posted January 26, 2011 Report Share Posted January 26, 2011 Which one, if either, do you see losing there next night? I think Andy will get past vitor, but I, for some reason,am thinking shields is going to beat gsp(flame on). So if one of them loses would you still want to see gsp Vs silva? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UMCMMA Posted January 26, 2011 Report Share Posted January 26, 2011 GSP vs Silva wil never happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hells_Bartender Posted January 26, 2011 Report Share Posted January 26, 2011 Which one' date=' if either, do you see losing there next night? I think Andy will get past vitor, but I, for some reason,am thinking shields is going to beat gsp(flame on). So if one of them loses would you still want to see gsp Vs silva?[/quote'] Pretty sure GSP will beat Shields and Andy will beat Vitor. But if Shield beats GSP I don't think he'll duck Silva ala GSP. Shields vs.Silva sometime soon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shinsplint Posted January 26, 2011 Report Share Posted January 26, 2011 Which one' date=' if either, do you see losing there next night? I think Andy will get past vitor, but I, for some reason,am thinking shields is going to beat gsp(flame on). So if one of them loses would you still want to see gsp Vs silva?[/quote'] Your predictions seem spot on to me..^ & IF Safe Pierre grows a pair & decides to fight Anderson.... It will be Anderson via manslaughter... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamamaw Posted January 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 26, 2011 I thought for sure when shields was coming to the ufc it was going to be at MW. Imagine shields doing what sonnen did to andy, but with some submission defense. Would be very interesting to see... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IanThePhoenix Posted January 26, 2011 Report Share Posted January 26, 2011 Shields is gonna be rhaped by GSP. The fight is in Canada. It's pretty clear who the winner will be. Dana is only having Shields fight GSP to steal Strikeforce fans from SF to the UFC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamamaw Posted January 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 26, 2011 Shields is gonna be rhaped by GSP. The fight is in Canada. It's pretty clear who the winner will be. Dana is only having Shields fight GSP to steal Strikeforce fans from SF to the UFC. Shields isnt going to be a walkover, unless he comes in with cadio like in the kampman fight. I think everyone is always underestimating jake. He is always the underdog, but keeps wining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MABFanForLife Posted January 26, 2011 Report Share Posted January 26, 2011 Shields is gonna be rhaped by GSP. The fight is in Canada. It's pretty clear who the winner will be. Dana is only having Shields fight GSP to steal Strikeforce fans from SF to the UFC. This. Shields doesn't have anything that GSP should worry about. Takedowns? He's outwrestled Fitch and Koscheck. BJJ? Please. I think the dude is one of the most overrated BJJ practitioners in the sport. Every tough opponent he's ever faced, he never submitted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IanThePhoenix Posted January 26, 2011 Report Share Posted January 26, 2011 GSP will have some of that UFC champion's magic (a la Anderson Silva) to help him win, unless he gets KTFO. Then he's SOL... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovernmentMule Posted January 26, 2011 Report Share Posted January 26, 2011 This. Shields doesn't have anything that GSP should worry about. Takedowns? He's outwrestled Fitch and Koscheck. BJJ? Please. I think the dude is one of the most overrated BJJ practitioners in the sport. Every tough opponent he's ever faced' date=' he never submitted.[/quote'] You make a lot of sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.