Javynstuff Posted March 16, 2011 Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 Both coming off of losses both looking to get in it this fight makes sense to me so who would take it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
towhatend Posted March 16, 2011 Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 I'd like to see this fight. One person stays near the top, the other takes a tumble further down. Dunham would take this. He's more well rounded than Sotiropoulos and won't gas like Lauzon did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarDawg Posted March 16, 2011 Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 Dunham would win he's the more well rounded fighter... Sotiropoulos would have to get him to the ground and submit him and i just don't see him being able to take Evan down if he couldn't take down Dennis Siver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLifeGuard Posted March 16, 2011 Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 before G-SOT fought Siver everyone was saying he has good striking but after Siver crushed him in the stand up it just shows he is only a ground fighter Dunham would TKO him round to p.s this is coming from a Dunham hater Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
towhatend Posted March 16, 2011 Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 before G-SOT fought Siver everyone was saying he has good striking but after Siver crushed him in the stand up it just shows he is only a ground fighter Dunham would TKO him round to p.s this is coming from a Dunham hater I don't think anyone was saying Sotiropoulos had good striking...and how can (or why do) you hate Dunham? Just curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Javynstuff Posted March 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 To be honest I always though gsot was overrated I actualy had a sig bet against him for the siver fight, I know guillard would be an animal with the Jackson team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmctaggart08 Posted March 16, 2011 Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 This would be a ****ing amazing fight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Javynstuff Posted March 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 I know I'm surprised no one is debating this right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kristufa Posted March 16, 2011 Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 G-Sot's stock plummeted after getting mauled by Siver. Have to go with Dunham. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chute_Boxe_Champion Posted March 16, 2011 Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 ... can we make it so both guys get wins before you bury guys in a deep division. give them fights against different guys and if they both win than make it happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Javynstuff Posted March 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 G-Sot's stock plummeted after getting mauled by Siver.Have to go with Dunham. True but Dunham got DESTROYED by Melvin I mean that was an a$$ whooping for real Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kristufa Posted March 16, 2011 Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 True but Dunham got DESTROYED by Melvin I mean that was an a$$ whooping for real Yeah, but in that match-up we could see a distinct power advantage for a single fighter. Dunham pretty much KNEW that he needed the fight on the ground. I would actually argue that G-Sot's performance was worse for a number of reasons. 1) He was supposedly #1 contender after a possible win 2) Although we knew Siver had the advantage in the stand-up we though G-Sot could hold his own 3) His wrestling was absolutely pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Javynstuff Posted March 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 Yeah' date=' but in that match-up we could see a distinct power advantage for a single fighter.Dunham pretty much KNEW that he needed the fight on the ground. I would actually argue that G-Sot's performance was worse for a number of reasons. 1) He was supposedly #1 contender after a possible win 2) Although we knew Siver had the advantage in the stand-up we though G-Sot could hold his own 3) His wrestling was absolutely pathetic.[/quote'] True plus Melvin had already KOd siver, Let's see how shane roller does Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kristufa Posted March 16, 2011 Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 True plus Melvin had already KOd siver' date=' Let's see how shane roller does[/quote']Should be a great fight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Javynstuff Posted March 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 Keep voting u bast*rds : Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
verJJ Posted March 16, 2011 Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 Gsot held his own in the 2nd and 3rd against Siver, and if I remember Gsot has pro boxing experience, but Gsot would win by sub Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.