UB41 Posted July 2, 2011 Report Share Posted July 2, 2011 Round 1 was Sivers due too his takedown defense.. Im sorry but holding on to your opponents legs up against the fence doesnt give you too much points.. Wiman won Round 2..Siver won round 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Brashears Posted July 2, 2011 Report Share Posted July 2, 2011 The only reason why it looked bad was because of the bloody 2nd round Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melvinj0 Posted July 2, 2011 Report Share Posted July 2, 2011 OMFG this is such sht. Just because Siver is an entertaining fighter people are trying to justify this BS decision. Get your fanboy heads out of your asses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaserKaiser Posted July 2, 2011 Report Share Posted July 2, 2011 The only reason why it looked bad was because of the bloody 2nd round Yeah this is true....Don't leave it to the Judges. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCR_SOLIDER Posted July 2, 2011 Report Share Posted July 2, 2011 omfg this is such sht. Just because siver is an entertaining fighter people are trying to justify this bs decision. Get your fanboy heads out of your asses. you mad brah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UB41 Posted July 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 2, 2011 The only reason why it looked bad was because of the bloody 2nd round This exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerChamp Posted July 2, 2011 Report Share Posted July 2, 2011 yeah it was a bad decision but if siver was japanese, wiman would have won all three rounds for sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UB41 Posted July 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 2, 2011 and i can careless about Siver dude..He won the fight..Its a 3 round fight.. Wiman won round 2 ok..What did he do rounds 1 and 3 besides getting his takedowns stuffed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerChamp Posted July 2, 2011 Report Share Posted July 2, 2011 what did siver do in that entire fight? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yesterdays_Hero Posted July 2, 2011 Report Share Posted July 2, 2011 Wiman had 1 great round Siver had 1 good round They had 1 close round. It really could of went either way, if there was some other kind of scoring system Wiman probably would of won, but there isn't... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molejao43 Posted July 2, 2011 Report Share Posted July 2, 2011 OMFG this is such sht. Just because Siver is an entertaining fighter people are trying to justify this BS decision. Get your fanboy heads out of your asses. Why do you get so mad? Why u have to insult other people? Why not say ur opinion and leave it at that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UB41 Posted July 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 2, 2011 what did siver do in that entire fight? Defended Takedowns...If wrestlers can get so much points for just completing a takedown, fighters should get the same points for defending them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.